I also own www.tripoptimizer.com domain.
Let me know if interested.
1,168 karma · joined July 16, 2007
I also own www.tripoptimizer.com domain.
Let me know if interested.
Usually people say that solution is not the important thing for a question but the process of getting to a correct or wrong solution is important. Some times interviewers ignore this fact.
Instead of puzzles or problems which may surprise some candidates, how about American Idol auditions style interviews. For example, you ask a candidate (for programming job) to design/implement/test some small problem giving the full requirements or simulating changing requirements. Will this process help select a right candidate?
I think the level of commitment from the other two co-founders is much less according to your description, I am not even sure you should give them co-founder status. Remember you're working full time on the project that means you're investing $x (your full time job's salary) every month as opposed to the other guys. From your description the other two guys seems to be playing safe, not risk takers (very much required ingredient for startups)
I think you really need to find new team members who are committed, dedicated, and risk takers.
As far as finding new team members, I think it would be nice to work with people who you know already to reduce time consumed building a new relationship. Otherwise, you got to work with people for some time to find workable team members.
Best of luck
I thought that was little weird for me because I thought both them would have at least 6 months ahead of anyone who tries to copy their idea, but they weren't thinking that way.
Is it ok to sign a NDA? Are there somethings to watch out for? With respect to these candidates, is asking for NDA right way to share an idea and collaborate with others?