peterchon

There's nothing stopping you from using inline-styles. It's another approach.

Perhaps, which is why I appreciate everyone's feedback.

It does say: "more to come" maybe you'll get more laughs.

Hey sorry that you were stuck with a framework. It's not a framework, it's meant to be a quick way to add styles without having to make more css classes.

Hey, thanks for taking a look. I'm sorry that it wasn't a parody. It's something that's helped me make quick small style changes without having to make more css classes.

Thanks for taking a look. I appreciate everyone's feedback. I understand that it looks redundant and unorthodox, but this way of writing css does help me when I need to add a quick style fix here and there without having to change my main style sheet.

Thanks for taking a look. Could you share why you feel that way?

Thanks for taking a look, I appreciate everyone's opinion on things. Could you share why you think this way?

I appreciate you taking a look, thanks!

Hi, thanks for looking. You don't have to do anything that you don't want to do.

Well, the year isn't over yet :P

Hi thanks for looking. Could you elaborate on your last statement?

Hi, thanks for taking a look.

I'm not trying to be bootstrap. I wanted a way for users to add css without using an inline-css. As for psudo selectors, it's still easy: .do-this-on-hover:hover { ... }

Interesting - I'll take a look.

I appreciate your kind words. It's always tough to put things out there for scrutiny.

Hi, I'm sorry that I gave you such stress - it wasn't my intention. It would be helpful if you could explain why it caused you such angst.

Hi, thanks for taking a look.

I don't think it's a "better" way, I wanted to explore another way of adding quick styles without having to come up with a class name.

Hi, thanks for taking a look. Could you tell me why this won't work without JS?

My motivation to write this is because I always have to go back and make quick margin/padding/etc changes and I hated trying to come up with more class names.

As mentioned, this isn't a framework. It was a way for me to add styles when writing styles to custom directives.

Thanks for taking a look. As mentioned, it's not a framework - it's a way for me to add simple styling without having to find/add/replace existing class. It may not seem useful to you as a complete solution like bootstrap - but when writing custom directives, it really helped me.

bit pricey

You should really include a non-zipped js as well.

I gave my kids an ipad 2 and it's been through 3 years of hell, but it still works like a champ.

I disagree - I think everyone has a different needs, I would say those ones you perceive as "emotional, impatient, and poor team player" are the most loyal champions of the company and really gave it their all.

I disagree, isn't it better to go to another company that might provide challenge/pay rather then looking for things to do (especially on that company's dime?)

What would be interesting to see if we replace all applicant's informations were anonymous and everyone got reviewed strictly based on merits.

I think that's interesting. I understand that you're looking for someone with basic/foundational knowledge - but can you really judge them on not knowing (or be able to explain) a specific function?

Wouldn't it be better to ask a problem and see how the person might solve the problem?

Thank you for the thoughtful response!

It's really weird to me trying to do a lot of data handling on the front-end side rather than using server-side.

yes. yes it does.

I have, but I'm having hard time creating projects that uses (or rather justify using) the higher-level JS programming paradigm.