phaemon

The figures for 2021 aren't available yet as the year isn't over. If you want more immediate data, please ask your elected representative to prioritise funding scientific research.

I'm curious why you're fixating on this year though? Do you think something has changed from the past 20 years? You do know the SMB has been mostly positive over that period, right?

No, your link shows SMB, my link shows the overall loss. There is no gain. Please learn what these numbers mean. I have had this conversation hundreds of times. You are completely wrong.

EDIT: If you don't believe me, simply email the folk at the Danish Arctic research institution (the link you provided). They will confirm.

As is very clearly stated in the page you linked to: "It does not include the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater."

There has of course been no "recovery". You can see the Greenland Ice Sheet loss at: https://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/resources/30/greenland-ice-loss-2...

This one is a continual talking point for climate change deniers, and is corrected every time, but it still gets trotted out. I strongly advise you to actually learn something about this topic as I've seen you attempt to post on it before.

I find it interesting. You can try your vegan post. Sounds a bit dull but go for it.

You just want to make sure you have IPP and Bonjour enabled and it should Just Work. A quick google finds https://www.dailycupoftech.com/how-to-set-up-a-print-server-... which looks about right

I'm afraid you are. If your project is open source, it's quite likely someone will put a copy up on GitHub while they're working on it.

You can learn what Hemingway actually did in WWI, the Spanish Civil War, and WWII at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Hemingway#World_War_I

> the median American making $40-60k a year with a modest amount of credit card debt and kids to feed.

Ah, of course. Poor unfortunate Americans. How could you possibly feed your children on just $40k a year. No doubt that explains the emaciated appearance of the average American child.

> A comment like this is privilege in a nutshell.

Copy that out on the blackboard 100 times until the lesson sinks in.

"The elements of computing systems" aka "Nand to Tetris" takes you through the process and I could understand it despite not having a degree. Highly recommended.

It means a secondary language, not a primary one.

That isn't what "lingua franca" means, which is a poor start to your "it's better to only know one language" argument.

Not even close. What do you reckon the highest temperature was achieved in a house?

Imagine I was measuring the temperature in your home. I measured above your grill. Is that a good average for your home temperature?

Useless use of cat

> Databases (or cattle, how or what ever they may be)

It's a reference to the idea that you should treat your servers as "cattle, not pets". In other words, they're disposable and you should be fine with destroying one and creating a new one to take its place.

The parent is saying that it's fine to treat databases more like pets, where they're pampered and looked after carefully, and fed treats - much like DBAs are, I believe.

No, even if you could kill Hitler, then WW2 doesn't happen, computers aren't invented yet, so time travel isn't invented yet so you can't head back to kill him. Read your briefing notes.

Also https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HitlersTimeTrave...

> if this were the case, then the USA would have actually benefited from these wars

Well, sure, if you believe that the powers that be were acting for the benefit of their country rather than for themselves.

There doesn't seem to be any conclusions at all drawn by the journalist: it's literally a quote from a scientist that talks of the conclusion.

Are you suggesting that scientists shouldn't investigate anomalous events that are becoming more common because ignorant people might confuse them with entirely expected but relatively rare events?

There possibly is great stuff there, but after having dismissed the third popup in roughly as many seconds, I gave up and hit the back button.

I've no idea why websites do this. No one wants it.

Inditex has revenue of about $23 billion, Gap is around $16 billion, Primark is around $8 billion. They're not as far apart as you think.

> someone who submits a truthful resume to a job posting where they don't technically meet the qualifications has only made a little white lie

They haven't lied at all. Where is the lie in saying, "I don't meet your requirements but I think you should hire me anyway"?

Your odds of getting an interview don't significantly improve after you meet just 50% of the requirements (40% if you're female): https://talent.works/2018/11/27/the-science-of-the-job-searc...

Surely you can with cgroups? Isn't that exactly what they're for?

I'm sure you do. Along with your wish to:

"check back on this coin when its tokenomics have improved. I am not interested in something with 70% of the total supply not yet in circulation."

...

He just said he felt guilty about extracting maximal value for minimum return. That's the opposite of management.

104 seems enough to be meaningful. Might have a fair margin of error but that's ok. Why do you think otherwise?

You can hold down the right-arrow key to scroll, and you reach Mercury in 12 seconds.

If you're just having one a day, a cold beer is healthier than a cold Coke.

The research wasn't by Newsweek, it was by the Pew Research Center. Newsweek is just reporting it.