Call it what you will a cover message or note perhaps.
301 karma · joined November 15, 2019
Call it what you will a cover message or note perhaps.
You can kvetch about the media all you want, but the job market is the best it has ever been, and unlikely to get any better. Sorry to be harsh here, but if you can't find a job in this market, you ought to reconsider your professional choices.
Since you asked, I speak with the experience of starting 3 businesses across Pharma, Defense and Media industries. I have also been involved in hiring multiple people across sectors, both in tech and non-tech jobs. As you also know, for defense that involves White-as-Wonderbread US citizens only, I also have interviewed almost exclusively from a certain complexion-gender combination club. Thus have formed my own pattern recognition, with an n of several hundred. If you are open to listening I can share a few illustrative anecdotes. Admittedly my posts are just opinions as I can only offer my own perspective. Although this study, and multiple others, seems to support my viewpoint.
p.s. Truth hurts.
note: I am a 3x entrepreneur and my opinions are based on my 2 decades of experience in IT.
There's trillions of dollars of potential damages at stake. Even if this was a Chernobyl type disaster due to mismanagement and negligence, the CCP will be on the hook, and they are all too aware of it. IMHO this debate is healthy & necessary.
* Points for education level MS/PhD,
* Salary indexed to COL,
* Job location (Kansas earns higher points vs SF),
* some points for scholarly merit (patents, peer-reviewed publications) and so on...
This would address the some legitimate concerns of US workers, make the process transparent and orderly, but also keep the tech economy rolling. The current system is asinine and needs serious reform.
This is one of the greatest things the US has - immigrant entrepreneurs == entrepreneur^2 - and would be foolish to shut it down.
1. Did you look at CLIP? it provides a common (to images & text) embedding.
2. Do your models need specialized training (vs. open models)?
caveat: have cursory knowledge of neuroscience
So Im skeptical of this outsider/insider characterization, IMHO it's almost always the individuals.
related: https://github.com/netrasys/pgANN
Plenty of approaches existed prior to deep learning, it's just that DL just blew those out of the water with its performance.
p.s. BTW I would bucket these approaches as ML too. ML >> DL
[1] https://docs.opencv.org/master/db/d27/tutorial_py_table_of_c...
[2] https://docs.opencv.org/master/d5/d33/structcv_1_1HOGDescrip...
Programmers are already among the highest paid professions anywhere, so it's laughable that they complain about "less pay". Who's next? hedge fund managers and investment bankers complaining about low bonuses?