phi-go

No word about the future of Jujutsu, so I guess this is bad news for for jj users?

There is a link to a shell script in the article to check if you have any impacted package installed.

Not sure why you are only crediting google. This is a big research area in cryptography.

The current rfc is here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3407

It does have some more discussion on keywords vs attributes and other options.

I think they mean this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232289

Isn't defining what should not be done by anyone a problem that laws (as in legislation) are for? Though, it's not that I expect that those laws would come in time.

Why do you think that?

This sounds wrong, features have to be the value of your code. The required maintenance and slow down to build more features (technical debt) are the liability, which is how I understood the relationship to "lines of code" anyway.

Crux seems interesting to share app logic between platforms but I don't see how it helps actually render something. Don't you still need a gui framework that supports android or ios?

This is very neat. I'll have to try it out to say more but thanks for open sourcing it.

Do you know SkedPal?

I don't think babies can swim but they know not to try and breathe in water. Which is probably what you meant.

You can also forbid unwraps as part of clippy.

With peer review you do not even have a choice as to which reviewers to trust as it is all homogenized by acceptance or not. This is marginally better if reviews are published.

That is to say I also think it would be worthwhile to try.

There are numbers on how many tries it took. I would also find the individual prompts and images interesting.

No, it was shown this doesn't average out, there is a study linked upthread.

But they do not get payed the same. Let's say Spotify has two users that total 100 listens, 99 Taylor listens and one listen for the obscur artist.

If payed by total listens Taylor gets 99%.

Now if those 99 listens are from the one user and the other from the other user. Paying by listens ratio per user, Taylor will get 50%.

They call this a miracle even in the article you linked.

As you wrote a paper, how difficult would you say is it to recreate the template of the venue you submitted to?

Ask you anything? Well here it goes...

What languages do you use?

What kind of projects?

Do you maintain these projects or is this for greenfield development?

Could you fix any bugs without Claude?

Are these projects tested, who writes the tests. If it's Claude how do you know these tests actually test something sensible?

Is anybody using these projects and what do users think of using these projects?

Fair enough, also thinking about it some more. If you use that option the old 90% will usually be normalized to 100% so this might not even be helpful.

Why not instead limit the charging level to 90%? Should save battery life as well.

There is one, though, focused on security: https://openssf.org/projects/criticality-score/

Does this have a compute benefit or could one use different specialized LLM architectures / models for the subnetworks?

Interesting, so an LSP MCP like this?: https://github.com/isaacphi/mcp-language-server

Also interesting note on the docs, though, Claude does try to use cargo doc by itself sometimes.

I was actually wondering why GritQL did not have an MCP, this seems like a natural fit. Would be interested to know if this works for you.

I'm always a bit hesitant to add things to the long term context as it feels very finicky to not have it be ignored and having more seems to make it more likely to be ignored. Instead I usually just repeat myself.

Thank you for the answer, seems there is still lots of things to try.

This reads like the author has a lisp, with the letter s looking like an f.

What MCP tools are you using?

The ? will directly return Err if there is one during read_input_file(). This is just some syntactic sugar.

Operand(u32) (see definition of Token), n will be parsed as a u32. See here: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.str.html#method.pars...

To me the argument also only makes sense as you understood it.