4,285 karma · joined January 3, 2013
Do they? Is H200 $-competitive with an ASIC for crypto? Bearing in mind they're 4 figures.
First, the societal view on HN-approved hackers is not always positive.
Second, society is bad at recognising systemic problems, that doesn't mean they aren't problems. Something with short term gain for long term harm is a particular problem for our society to handle.
> It is not like she is one-shotting books with a single prompt
It's not clear where she gets the original concept - maybe it's an original idea - fine. But maybe that's another few prompts. Which would make her little more than a meat proxy.
> she has a structured process starting from a human outline and ideas
It's not massively complicated though is it.
> plus human review at the end.
Yeah, it's the proofreaders having to work through hundreds of pages of slop I'm bothered about. Even if you assume the latest models are awesome it's not like this is Astra/frontier output is it?
* https://www.gitbook.com/status
* https://www.gitbookstatus.com/
You get why this is confusing, right?
Who added this? When? In what version? What's the CVE? Where's the security disclosure? Is this privacy risk encapsulated in your S-1 filing.
Simple RCAs seem to be beyond companies this days.
I don't doubt you need the money. But the tax take on these places is always fictional.
If you look at 10-36MW DCs, the number of people on site is like 10, many are security and it's not a proportional relationship.
What money is it going to bring? 6 months of noisy construction work and then like.. half a dozen security guys on shifts and an engineer call out once a week?
Note that the summary at the top of https://www.gitbookstatus.com at time of writing does not mention the unauthorized access and the incident details does not mention the contents disclosed above.
Anthropic's position is seemingly that it was "another part of the publishing process [that] was compromised"
The problem would be better solved with an opt-in.
Sure it can. If you're downloading it for commercial purposes (clearly the case) you're violating the license.