10,482 karma · joined February 1, 2013
I always thought “analog” made more sense and it’s commonly used in other areas.
(Okay, technically you could make an e-bike with completely analog electronics, but I highly doubt anyone does commercially)
There’s even “pushbike” if you want to go way back, though admittedly it sounds rather archaic.
“Acoustic” just sounds like a Portlandia joke.
> In August 2026 a new cross border passenger rail connection opened between Tornio in Finland and Haparanda in Sweden. This then allows an uninterrupted rail journey from Kemijärvi in Finnish Lapland to Lagos in Portugal, the two places furthest apart in the EU that can be connected by train. I, Jon Worth, the person who worked this out, aim to be the first person to complete the whole trip, and set the first record time for this journey.
https://web.archive.org/web/20260830071400/https://www.jwz.o...
https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Manipulating_Satellite_Photos_Now_R...
It would also be nice if I could position pieces freely outside of the board so I could test out potential matches.
In the end, it became easier to just keep trying to place pieces on the board until they stuck together automatically.
I also don’t understand what the different colored parts of the ring represent.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/an-oral-history-of-tim-curry...
What I would love to see as a companion to this is some sort of rigors benchmark for scanning that attempts to quantify how much real-world scanability is lost. There must be some decoding benchmarks out there that simulate common types of distortion, damage and degradation. What did the original designed of the QR code use to evaluate their work?