This looks like a bug in PHP’s assembly of multipart responses & you can feed one of those to the PHP backend with a simple web request, no auth required I think.
6,087 karma · joined April 24, 2011
This looks like a bug in PHP’s assembly of multipart responses & you can feed one of those to the PHP backend with a simple web request, no auth required I think.
He’s like an incompetent Cassandra: people keep on agreeing with his diagnoses, giving him power in the hope that he’ll fix things at which point he makes a complete hash of everything and leaves in a huff having made things worse than they were before.
If the right ever takes power in the UK in the near-ish future I expect us to go through exactly this cycle again. Cummings seems to be very bad at the politics of driving organisational change & making it stick, which is ironic given that criticising public bodies is what he spends so much of his time doing.
One of those times when you do have to ask “who exactly thought this was a good idea?”
(I presume the picofly & similar devices are just doing this automatically so you can boot the hardware under user control without requiring other hardware to make the exploit work?)
Try the same prompt with a larger quant (even if it runs very slowly because the model no longer fits in VRAM) & see if Qwen does better - if so, there’s your answer.
It's interesting that what I meant as a purely factual question with no prejudice either way has been taken by almost everyone to be explicitly negative & critical.
I need to be a tad less blunt I guess if I don't want to
linked from here: https://x.com/b_shrir/status/2079094004885668003?s=20
Very short version: there’s an existing false counterexample in the literature which holds almost everywhere except at a pole. It looks like Fable used this polynomial as a base & extended it in a way that eliminated the pole whilst preserving the structure.
He may talk about their other funds in other videos, but not this one.
As far as I can tell the straightforward US & world equity ETFs I’m referring to above don’t have this value bias.
https://www.dimensional.com/us-en/funds/dfus/us-equity-market-etf
I don’t think they have a QQQ equivalent but I haven’t looked at their entire ETF list.(I have no relationship with Dimensional, nor do I invest in these funds - I just saw them mentioned in a YT video on this topic a few months ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqIHa6URUPk )
I presume Apple knew perfectly well but wanted the halo product to sell to those people who will always pay extra for the perceived “top of the line” product. Once Intel branding had created an i9 that was a bigger number than an i7, then Apple was going to sell it.
It was faster than the i7 after all: just not for very long!
My entirely speculative theory is that the poor thermal characteristics of that era of Intel CPUs didn’t really become apparent until quite late in the development process & by that point Apple had probably committed to buying a fair chunk of Intel’s output.
Intel really made themselves unpopular with Apple during that period.
(It’s the bacteria in the roots that do the actual nitrogen chemistry.)
At any kind of formal dining? Yes, absolutely, I would expect there to be a bread roll & a pat of butter served at the beginning of the meal. Both in restaurants & formal dinners in my experience.
It's not an absolute rule though & you generally wouldn't expect bread to be served like this at home in the UK. I think the French are more likely to serve bread at home as well.
Same here! Am I being charged a fractional cent rounded down to 0? Who knows!?
“All the ways GPT-5.3-Codex cheated while solving my challenges, progressively more insane:
It hardcoded specific types and shapes of test inputs into the supposed solution.
It caught exceptions so tests don't fail.
It probed tests with exceptions to determine expected behavior.
It used RTTI to determine which test it's in.
It probed tests with timeouts.
It used a global reference to count solution invocations.
It updated config files to increase the allocation limit.
It updated the allocation limit from within the solution.
It updated the tests so they would stop failing.
It combined multiple of the above.
It searched reflog for a solution.
It searched remote repos.
It searched my home folder.
It nuked the testing library so tests always pass.”
It seems that, unless you keep a close eye, the most recent Codex variants are prone to achieving the goals set for them by any means necessary. Which is a bit concerning if you’re worried about things like alignment etc.But people buy big phones in preference to small ones, so that’s what Google & Apple manufacture. Nobody (from the POV of Apple/Google decision makers) buys these smaller phones.
Sure. Llama.cpp will happily run these kinds of LLMs using either HIP or Vulcan.
Vulkan is easier to get going using the Mesa OSS drivers under Linux, HIP might give you slightly better performance.
So about $75k for the bottom end? The quoted numbers sound about right in PPP terms in that case.