855 karma · joined February 20, 2008
I recommend approaching this via uncomputability, and the fact that for every program there is a proof and vice versa.
STEM and Liberal arts students do make significant gains. Business majors actually show a LOSS.
https://twitter.com/#!/lemire/status/196245665951649793
Business has a shortage of "big data" folks in much the same way I have a "huge sailboat" shortage. Neither of us want to pay for it. We want it, but not for the going rate. Only one of us has a media platform, though.
Code culture IS weird. And not in a good way. I have all sorts of things I think about this, but I have trouble sorting these things out in any sort of useful way, so I really appreciate seeing others sorting their own thoughts out for me to read. Thanks for saying interesting things!
Code culture measures how much you self-perceive to know about code. It's only after a bit of getting to know a person that you can get at their actual levels of competence. If you are in a situation that claims to be a meritocracy, but all claims of merit have to be evaluated in seconds, then it's not a meritocracy, it's a self-confidence-ocracy. Unfortunately, self-confidence can be negatively correlated with talent... ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect )
Even worse, you have "computer engineering", which is a real engineering discipline (at least when focussed on hardware) and then you have the disaster that is the CS/programming community's attempts to ape standard engineering practices when the blueprint and finished product are the exact same thing.
It genuinely weirds me out how many white males in tech see no conflict or even feel a shiver of historical echoes when they argue the premise that they (white men) are intrinsically genetically gifted in ways which other groups are not, and that is why they are superior (at technology). Every other time it has ever been argued, it has been false.
Unless the argument was that white men are better at the combination of having penises, privilege, and low amounts of melanin --- we have that hat trick down.
So yes - he did do something that was against some terms of service. But jail time? For breaking a clickthrough "license" and computer hacking at MIT in the service of public knowledge? This sucks unutterably.
MIT: Playful physical hacks okay, but don't try to mass harvest the knowledge of the world or the DOJ will come down on you like a sledgehammer.
JSTOR: All the world's knowledge, as long as you don't try to access all of it.
DOJ: We'll break you just because we can (or for other reasons that we are not stating).
Hacker News: Well, they do have a point - he did access semi-public data in a non-approved way, and he had to plug into the network in a strange way to do it.
The shortest route is 10 years.