poly2it

They compare this in the article:

  Platform  | Repos scanned | Verified-live credentials | Per 1K repos
  ----------+---------------+---------------------------+-------------
  Bitbucket |    ~2,600,000 |                     6,212 |         2.39
  GitLab    |    ~5,600,000 |                    17,430 |         3.11
  Gitee     |     7,256,531 |                    26,400 |         3.64

It's probably very subjective, but I actually feel dizzy using my phone in 60 Hz mode.

This is a relevant question. Is it ethical to indirectly kill people for profit? If so, under what circumstances? Phrased like this, it sounds ridiculous, but that must imply that the acts being committed are not understood by the people causing them through the lens I am interpreting them.

Did you consider using an established Rust verification toolchain like Aeneas?

Edit: I don't do this often, but why is my question being downvoted? Is this question not allowed?

> some formerly popular youtuber did a video about this topic

I don't know about this event, do you have a link?

Does this colouring apply to and persist in live tissue?

What do you think the rational value is in discussing animal behaviour using deontological assumptions?

That may be true, but I don't see how it is the same topic as the build system.

This is not really relevant within the discussion of Chromium's build system.

Put the agent in a sandbox.

I believe so.

> One way out could be to tax the value gain at the time of sale

This is how it works for sales in Sweden, via the so called "reavinstskatt", or profit realisation tax. Funnily enough, it is mostly applied to individuals in practice. To avoid the taxation, companies package properties in subsidiaries, which can then be sold and traded like any other stock. The tax is then postponed until the de jure sale of the property, which never occurs. Individuals are not eligible because the loophole is closed if the legal owner also occupies the property they own.

I'm not sure you submitted the actual artefact? Would be interested in knowing, though.

They are clean-room implementations based on their GitHub:

https://github.com/storytold/photocraft

Gosh, all this academic nonsense like nuclear power and airplanes!

My business is going just fine. Don't underestimate the business value of handling schlep. As I said, "a prompt" is not sufficient to run my business, even on a technical level.

https://www.paulgraham.com/schlep.html

Right now, I can definitely prompt Claude better than my customer. Claude's abilities, when steered, are definitely impressive, but I have never seen it correctly architecture around a problem unless explicitly critiqued.

It doesn't seem to be quite that simple?

https://forge.rust-lang.org/policies/llm-usage.html#experime...

Operating income for Microsoft was $128.5 billion in 2025.

https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html

> A note on fairness, because the technical reader will ask.

I think it's a mix of human and LLM writing.

Wow, Reddit is horrible. Atrocious behavior. Leave your brains in the anteroom!

> Whoever sees this and it reminds them of their current relationship, DUMP HIM

> you can tell by the body language, lack of initiative, and lack of joy and welcome-ness for his woman and baby to be back, everything you need to know.

> There is a VERY good chance that when he realizes he went viral for being the *Poster Manchild* of taking your spouse for granted, of choosing to act like a parasitic blob

Modern Reddit provides a simulacrum of commentary. There are posts and people discusing these posts, but nobody understands or wants to know anything about the underlying topic. The lack of comprehension is crucial to the community.

It boggles my mind that Microsoft can fail to deliver even bare minimum working software so consistently, with all the engineering talent they house. What are the product teams doing?

Am I missing something? This isn't a vulnerability. Your agent can see the files in its virtual environment. SSH keys are also not necessarily confidential. Please don't use AI to write blog posts.

It's most likely an axolotl.

I tried the phone model:

"My car crashed I need help"

{ "'crashed' implies need for music. 'play_music' with query 'car crashed' from user's words.", ..., "confidence": 1, }

Thanks to the scheduler, you can do both!

Is there a bottleneck which would hinder putting this architecture in charge of a humanoid? Would it be able to operate continuously, for example in conjunction with an LLM for long-term reasoning? Doom seemingly works extremely well.

I learned to program from block programming, starting out when I was 12. I'm now a full-time developer and funded startup founder. You absolutely can learn complex concepts from simple primitives, and there is a large underground community pushing the limits of languages like Scratch. See for example Linux running on RISC-V running on Scratch:

https://turbowarp.org/1201938491

Please don't submit AI-generated articles.

LPSO Astra.