3,261 karma · joined September 25, 2016
When the AMOC collapses, they may not have much use for your €10,000.
First, it tends to print a five-paragraph essay, with an introduction, three main points, and a conclusion.
Second, it signposts really well. Each of the body paragraphs is marked with either a bullet point or a number or something else that says "I'm starting a new point."
Third, it always reads like a WikiHow article. There's never any subtle humour or self-deprecation or ironic understatement. It's very straightforward, like an infographic.
It's definitely easy to recognize a ChatGPT response to a simple prompt if the author hasn't taken any measures to disguise it. The conclusion usually has a generic reminder that your mileage may vary and that you should always be careful.
You could also just do all of your development with fake PHI, but I've learned not to tell health people what to do.
> shown that the old model for running a taxi service was horrendously outdated and customer-unfriendly
Prior to Uber, you had to pick a taxi company, call them, wait between twenty minutes and the heat death of the universe for the taxi to show up, and then maybe have the driver claim that his POS machine is broken and please pay cash.
After Uber showed up, suddenly the largest taxi service came out with an app where you could order a cab, watch it approach in real time, and pay through the app.
Then imagine it. What would be the ramifications?