puddingnomeat

I think this is wrong.

Someone says "it COULD be stuck for weeks"

It gets unstuck earlier, fine. Doesn't invalidate the possibility.

The criticism is moot. If anyone had made bets, then I'd take both more seriously.

They're referring to https://auntymuriel.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/medusa.jpg?w...

This is the part where we all laugh and the credits roll out

Someone not knowing the two can't make the connection. Can AI?

anyone agreeing with the parent may find earplugs effective for focus in short (4 hour span) periods of work. After 6+ it gets eerily uncomfortable.

gluten free, too

Google 360 tour

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.753683,-122.420717,3a,90y,28...

does this flow effect work with the water analogy of electricity?

> “I was being bombarded with these conspiracy theories... about how it’ll go to $X,000...

It doesn't matter that there's a barrier in-between if you're breathing the same air. We knew early that IR detection was more effective.

Oblivious compliance. People prefer the option that looks effective. Besides, it's cheaper.

Previously

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24465207

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14917458

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9017960

One for programmers

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13305156

if you see a flaw why not change it? be specific. competition is good

doesn't seem to be that dead https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=quora.com

if data only supports your priors, is it useful?

pics or it didn't happen

A little too ironic

That depends. Where is the ceiling? There has to be a rational upper bound. Right?

  //Las Vegas algorithm
  repeat:
      k = RandInt(n)
      if A[k] == 1,
          return k;
        
  //Monte Carlo algorithm
  repeat 300 times:
      k = RandInt(n)
      if A[k] == 1
          return k
  return "Failed"

(...) Therefore, unlike Las Vegas, Monte Carlo does not gamble with run-time but correctness.

Interesting!

Is it easy to have a local copy?

I find it curious when people agree that X doesn't matter, but then they go about and compare outcomes based on X

in this case X=sex but it could be race, age, etc.

and why is it related to mbam? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10...

what is that supposed to mean?

coincidentally aired at the same time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGdqurw18gc

kiwix includes a relation to Qt5Core.dll with an invalid signature, not sure if relevant to anybody

Some advisors abuse emotionally. But everything is swept under the rug and administrators only care about results and no major complaints.

I also used to be very excited about online courses until I experienced them as superficial when compared to books and self-checks. I think the best way to learn some things ends up being experiential, so something more like an apprenticeship than a lecture would be the most efficient. But in reality, it seems hard to find that.

You also find the same in, for example, college. Where a tutor may be able to get you up to speed faster by 'debugging' your learning.