I feel robots.txt is the most effective to prevent a private site from being crawled by Google followed up by an inline <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> tag.
183 karma · joined February 23, 2016
I believe it was this setting (I have it disabled as well as other options - however I believe it's only this option that sends data back) [1].
However if I take the title from here it goes to the paywall.
I wonder if Google has recently adjusted the algorithm for this? Makes me wonder if they actually like paywalls, as I've always thought Google was against them.
"The article has since been updated, now it mentions $13.04 per 1000 views:" (niklaslogren) [1]
The user could then adapt to this range because they know the usage the best. Considering the dynamics of the computer and how we use them a range would be much more suited to fulfill this type of feedback from the system.
edit Also re-order the form locations, placeholders so it's nearly impossible to script automation for the page!
Do not underestimate how much a system like that is abused and that is where the problem is with not allowing anonymous transactions.
As much as I'd like to stop terrorism and activities that really are immoral to society as a whole, you can't circumvent the security of the people who are good because it's proven those systems become abused in ways that it was not originally intended.
I don't know a single person who can actually type on a smart phone without looking and nearly zero mistakes.
This is a big reason why I don't trust quotes until I get some sort of confirmed pricing from the seller.
Shouldn't have to, of course, but we kind of demand instant gratification and I feel this has led to poor service in many.
I've often thought well Century Link handles cost predicting well but maybe that is more due to the quality of the service and the fact they are over-charging for a lower quality service so it's easier to guarantee those prices. That doesn't reflect in the price comparison but it does show when you have the service and your comparing to your neighbor whom has the other.
Neat idea and while it's still at a very basic stage it'll be cool to see this evolve into something that could eventually be used by traffic controllers!
I think in all honesty the regulation sounds best, requiring the router makers to disable features such as UPNP would prevent massive attacks like these.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12762841
edit Of course this is if your local policy allows you to change this!
Like in reporting interfaces it's easier to highlight the data that you know the user is going to be looking at consistently - it helps with moving through the document as well as keeping your place. Sometimes information isn't required but if the user were wanting to go back and verify that information or use it to calculate something else they could do so easily (generally in my designs whenever I make something with less contrast I will also add an action for on focus/hover the item fades back in if the user may require that data more but still not as much as the main bits and pieces).
Places that this doesn't work great are articles and journals, big paragraphs of text (such as comments).
Balance, and the right use can make this technique useful in web page design but the author is very correct in that the vast majority doesn't understand the proper use and balance.
For we are not artists nor editor-in-chiefs so to say.
edit Should note that the reporting interfaces he is displaying do not do this well at all.
[1] http://superuser.com/a/389678
Some may argue as well that you can obtain better contrast in LCD but I'm no expert in that matter - I have just learned why CRTs are bad due to working as a programmer.
Other examples: "1MORE Piston Classic In-Ear Headphones with Microphone and Remote" $39.99 (Amazon Prime $19.99) "Anker Nylon Braided Tangle-Free Micro USB Cable (0.9m)" $9.95 (sale from $11.99) (Amazon Prime $4.99)
side note The prices I'm looking at are from Amazon USA so maybe that is why your sticking to AU only?
I attempted to remove root however this has now forced the phone to be stuck on Edge network (he can play but now only on WiFi :/) I have attempted to re-flash the physical ROM's (as well as the recovery matching those ROMs) from ASUS (successfully) and it still is stuck on edge. I've contacted his phone company (T-mobile) - insured the proper bands were being requested, 5x checked the APN settings and yet the phone still doesn't want to connect past edge. Here is the kicker, I scan for nearby cellular networks and T-Mobile (LTE) shows up, the phone registers, yet still won't obtain the connection.
Honestly that issue is probably due to some other restriction but it shows the frustration some users have had to deal with because of this move.
I even tried re-rooting the phone just to get his network back because he'd rather have his phone than Pokemon GO yet the phone had something special done to it to allow the network to work under root.
No one should have to go to those extremes especially when they aren't cheating and they are a paying customer.
In all honesty I don't believe the ban on root was done to deter hacking - my belief is that it was done because on average users only root because they want paid apps for free (a lot claim it's to tweak the UI and remove bloatware, but as more and more phone's get released we are starting to see this less and less of a requirement). While many rooted players (due to pre-rooting) are actually paying customers it still doesn't outweigh the paying customers who are not rooted and therefore it was more then likely a move to remove users who are less likely to put money into the game.
Every move they have done really reflects that they only want more money with the least amount of work and that is why I only keep the game installed to keep my 1 star reviewed from being weighted down due to being a review for an older version.
One of the big guys who is involved in creating a usable tracking system via a third-party map has made a wonderful statement about the many failures of Niantic [1]. From unnecessary obfuscation that only slows down older models, to banning the devices that aren't the reason cheating is happening, to not creating a good way to achieve feedback (apart from "critical errors" which is built into the app - maybe I should start complaining about the critical "Niantic" bug and that it needs to be fixed ASAP, but complaining won't really get anywhere if the company isn't listening to those problems) Niantic truly is on a path to destruction and I hope Nintendo doesn't let this amazing idea die if Niantic falls.
It really doesn't make sense to why they are making these decisions. The developers should know that banning rooted devices won't deter hackers - in fact I would have to say it's grown a few hackers/cheaters due to the frustration of dealing with lack of communication and oddly made decisions.
If anything I would say it's not worth it all, just turn it in to your nearby local law enforcement or trash it, not worth what could be the last thing you plug into your computer.
edit Not saying that Google's system fixes this but some users require nicer routers for that connection. I should note my actual computer gets an ethernet because I can never achieve on wireless what I can on wired!