GitLab is open core because I can run and use the software in a meaningful way under open source licenses.
MacOs is substantially different because I cannot take their open source kernel and run a functioning version of MacOs
1,562 karma · joined November 23, 2016
GitLab is open core because I can run and use the software in a meaningful way under open source licenses.
MacOs is substantially different because I cannot take their open source kernel and run a functioning version of MacOs
Why not limit how often you can change it, or make some other kind of limitation?
So the EU regulators can say my TOS have to allow EU citizens to access my site and my site must follow the GDPR.
That seems unlikely, and the fact that there's so much ambiguity around this is why so many websites are opting to block the EU rather than dealing with it.
Not the best on technical merits alone, but good enough along with a massive force of investment and wide adoption.
News site: "Click-bait headline about something that happened that doesn't really change things."
Reddit: "A picture or anecdote about something perfectly mundane that happens to everyone, presented in a slightly interesting way that ultimately doesn't matter"
Hackernews: "A random tech article that expresses someone's opinion, or a random release of software or announcement. Doesn't really matter."
The information most likely to spread is mundane information that appeals to the most people. Welcome to the viral internet.
At least Hackernews frequently surfaces interesting content with technical depth and merit. I've learned a ton here and gotten connected to interesting technologies.
Does Git have an easy way to share "uncommitted" code that doesn't involve committing it on a branch and rebaseing it later?
I say this as a huge fan of Git, that's one scenario where a Dropbox folder is stronger than Git
Basically you have all of your containers join the Docker network that your Traefik container is running on. Each container needs to expose a port (but not bind to the parent). The Traefik container will bind to port 80 on the parent. That guide should explain everything.
Let me know if you have any other questions or get stuck, I'd be happy to try and help!
E.g. I start paying month-to-month at 2016.2, after 12 months I have a license to 2016.2. But say after the first month, 2017.1 comes out. Then after 13 months I now have a license for 2017.1.
E.g. I add a label to my Gitea container to say "Serve this from git.mydomain.com", and Traefik will start redirecting requests and automatically configure a Let's Encrypt cert.
GitHub is free for public repositories and has huge engineering teams dedicated to uptime, security, and availability.
At the very least for Gitea/Gogs to self-host the code they'd have to pay for hosting costs that GitHub is already willing to provide for free.
I evaluated them both again a month ago and found that Gogs is as active or more active than Gitea by actual features developed, they just have less frequent releases.
Gitea has every feature that Gogs had at the point when they forked it, plus a few that they've ported over.
But there are still features that have been in Gogs for over a year now that Gitea does not have.
One example that burned me earlier this year, Gitea's backup/restore feature is still very underdeveloped. Gogs' backup/restore feature has been capable of backing up and switching databases for over a year, while Gitea still can only backup and restore to a database of the same type (e.g. Postgres to Postgres)
The current chrome UI is quite good at exposing necessary functionality without wasting space.
I don't know how it compares to OLPC, but it's basically what you're describing.
Or in other words, a gambler. Your profit from the game relies on convincing people that your game is fun and worthwhile; two ill defined concepts that vary from person to person.
With a business idea (shovels or middleman) your profit comes from convincing people that your product will help them make more money than they're paying you.
It's already easy to track someone down but it requires manpower, which limits the scope of tracking and requires the tracker to have a real motivation.
What's scary about mass surveillance is tracking of anyone and everyone for any reason at any time with very little required effort.
I don't really like that pubs work by me following them and them following me. When I open Patchwork most of my feed for any given channel is filled with notifications of people subscribing to that channel rather than actual posts.
But I do really like the adhoc, decentralized nature of it.
https://tt-rss.org/ seems to be gone/down.
It's only been in the past few years that sites have started to work relatively well between mobile and desktop formats without a separate mobile site.
And I say that as someone who thinks WebRTC has some pretty cool use cases.