984 karma · joined February 19, 2013
"easily" is not the word I'd use for that. by my calculations your annual taxable (aka net) income would need to exceed 300,000 (USD/EUR) before you see a break even point.
plus there is the risk (did your accountants and lawyers set it up correctly? will the laws or regulations change next year? etc etc)
without an access network (be that copper, fiber, or radio) internet bandwidth can't be delivered. the choke point is the modem.
access networks are a natural monopoly and infrastructure to support an access network MUST be regulated like one in order for "market solutions" to prevail.
but ATT, it's descendants, and the CableCo's have spent tens of millions on lobbying efforts to make sure that never, ever happens.
hell, the IS-IS implementation in Quagga is usable because of Google :)
plenty does!
if you don't rank on google for whatever it is you're launching/publishing -- you don't exist.
you could try sharing it with friends on facebook and hope for a social network effect, but just ask the journalism industry how organic reach is working out as of late
selling something online? your only hope is FBA. where the A stands for Amazon. I guess etsy might work too. so, okay...duopoloy!
and even if you don't care to be found, and aren't selling anything, it is TRIVIAL to take down any kind of not-expensive hosting (your raspi @ home, your DigitalOcean VPS, or colocated server) with a DDoS attack.
AWS, GCP, & Azure can weather most attacks, but it will cost you. And if it's large enough they'll shut you off anyway. and then send you a bill you can't pay.
so no, there is plenty stopping you from launching anything on the internet. the cost structures (be it time or money or both) greatly favor the massively entrenched incumbents. and not a little bit of favor. they favor them....bigly.
A person shows up and rings the bell for a solid 10 seconds. I buzz them in, then they practically throw the package from the elevator door saying "Tschussi!" as the door closes.
OK, I get it...no signature. that's fine. but you couldn't look like you were in more of a rush if you tried.
my guess is they're applying drone like KPIs to humans and it doesn't look very humane.
P4 is a domain-specific language for packet dataplanes. you can represent the various packet processing pipelines in a broadcom switch chip in P4. broadcom could easily build a P4 to tomahawk API.
P4 has tried very hard to be target independent. there are toolchains targeting GPUs, vSwitches, and FPGAs. you can compile P4 to eBPF.
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi12/nsdi12...
there's nothing to discuss. women have just as much right as men to be programmers or any other "computer science" or "tech" job and they reason there AREN'T that many of them is preicsely because of the pseudo-science bona fide bullshit written in his "Manifesto".
it only takes one asshole to drive away everyone else.
you'll be shocked to find out every single pair of sunglasses at Sunglass Hut is made from the same company.
for someone with a PhD in biological systems, you'd expect a person to be a little more developed in their thinking...
then again this is the same government who says the Constitution doesn't apply 100 miles in from the border (where a significant percentage of the populace lives...)