1,052 karma · joined April 14, 2008
Here's a little background about gistpoint, I was an FPGA developer working on DSP systems at a big company in D.C. Last May, bored of my job and frustrated at my career progress, I took the paths most travelled and quit my job to wander around the world. Along the way, I picked up ruby/rails and javascript because I want to transition into web programming. The learning curve was steep coming from the hardware world. Plus running from city to city also made it tough to maintain focus. 2 months ago, after many false starts and months of distraction, I finally decided to push it through completion.
gistpoint is a web app that lets you search and submit summaries for online articles. It's unique in that it has a scorer that rates how relevant a summary is compared to its fulltext. This is done by analyzing several factors such as information coverage, sentence grammar, word stemming, etc. So the best summary will rise to the top and gets shown as the default. No signup/login is needed to submit summaries, and quality is controlled without voting. When no user-submitted summary is available, it will extract the most relevant passage from the fulltext. From my experience if I just naturally summarize an article I just read, the scorer rates it highly compared to the extracted one.
Please let me know what you think. If anyone wants to know more about the scoring algorithm, I'll be happy to write a post about it. I definitely open source the summary extraction and grammar gems on github. They're already on rubygems https://rubygems.org/profiles/50055 for you to download, I just need to create the documentations.
I agree with this, may be displaying a color coded dot in place of the comment score. The color can be computed from a log function of the score, and we only need a few colors to indicate the different types of comments without giving too much information away.
edit: not a mix, but separate points for each community
1. There's a significant increase in the number of submissions over time while the number of frontpage articles remains the same (30). This leads to shorter articles lifespan. So if you visit HN as often as I do in a day, you will encounter a lot more good articles and also a lot more bad ones (the good to bad ratio may be the same, but our brain doesn't compute ratio intuitively, so it just gives more weigh to the majority bad articles). Note that 'bad' here just means stuffs I don't find interesting.
2. Wider range of topics (kind of related to the first point). So any given veteran will be less happy now that there are more articles that won't interest them.
3. Points inflation as the result of more users. 2-3 years ago, an article with score above 50 points is decent, now they're so common (may be a points exchange calculator to convert current score to score x days ago? ;-) )
But I doubt online reputation is that important. The reason I visit StackOverflow is to find answers to programming questions, not to look for experts. As for the experts, they don't need high karma on some Q&A site to get job offers.
I thought Wave was awesome when I tried it out with all my engineers friends. But then we somehow stopped, I didn't even remember how or when we stopped. Wave just seems like a really cool software that solves problem nobody has.
During the day when she goes to school, I work on my project. At times when I can't stand the loneliness, I get out and just hop on a random metro to read or observe people. At night, we cook, talk, and watch movies together. I'm having the best time of my life even though the future is a little scary to think about. I hope you enjoy yours as well, best of luck to your startup.
Disclosure: I created this awhile ago and almost forgot about it until I saw this poll
I don't have these types of accounts so I never get pre-IPO allocation, but what I did on IPO day was continuously refreshing the page to catch when it's first open (IPO usually open b/w 10am-12:00). You can almost always buy at lower price than the offer price within the first 15 minutes. Most IPOs (~80%) close lower than the offer price on the first day, and they continue to go down after that, you don't want to touch these. The remaining 20% are hot, and you know they're hot b/c the underwriters keep bumping the offer price up. I only played these and for very short term, from only a few minutes to a few days.
I'd time when the price starts bouncing back after the first 15 minutes, probably b/c more people realizing the stock is opened to the public and buy in, and buy 300-400 shares. After about 20 minutes of insane rising, the price will start to level out. At this point, I'd sell half of the shares to lock in the profit (~5% gain). I'd keep the rest for the next day, if the stock closes lower than open price then it shows weakness, I'd get out and never look at it again. If it's higher, I'd keep it for 2-3 more days.
With this strategy I was able to make a lot more than my day job. There used to be 7-8 IPOs every week, and a couple of those are hot so I was able to test this strategy for awhile. There were weeks that I made 20% on a position just over a few days (if I remember correctly the IPO was STV). There haven't been a lot IPOs since then and I haven't followed the market lately. May be it's time to start watching again.
My number 1 reason for quitting is I want to get off the addiction of the constant paychecks. It's easy and safe, but the trade off is the predictable and unbearable daily routine. Everyday on my way to work, I know exactly which lanes to switch to on 495 for the optimal travel time. I log on and off the computer at work at roughly the same times. Once back at home, it's sad to look at the reflections of myself and the clock in the bathroom while washing my face and know that the same action happened at exactly the same moment yesterday. As for long term, I know exactly where I will be (in the best scenario) in the next 15-20 years if I continue to work for this or any other big companies.
That's no way to live life if you look at the short time we have here. That's why I take the year off to travel, not only to break the daily routine, see new things, and meet new people but also to taste the danger of having no financial security to motivate myself to act.
Before quitting, I've consistently worked 2-3 hours everyday after work on side projects. But the passion and focus cannot be there after being exhausted by 8 hours of work and knowing I will still get the next paycheck even if my projects fail. So now I'm excited to have my 8 hours back. Let's see how this foolish thing will work out.
He just describes how the new phone is a little taller but not as wide as previous gen. He also mentions that both the front and back are made of glass.
That's about what I can make out of the noisy background.
What about killing for their own survival, after all respect for the lives of one's own race doesn't translate to respect for lives of others. This may be true, but with their intelligence I'd think they're smart and reasonable enough to explore other possibilities. I don't think aliens in soon-to-be-out-of-resources ships desperately flying around the universe for energy is a scenario advanced intelligent life forms planned for. It's more likely that they accept a peaceful conclusion to their existence.
Of course, it's very possible that we're all wrong since we're projecting our own primitive reasoning on species that are a lot more evolved.
There has been a ramp up in suppressing free speech and government policy in Vietnam over the last few months. Many key activists were imprisoned and websites/blogs that criticize the Communist Party were hacked or ddos attacked. An admin from one of those forums told me at the peak during the trials of those activists they got 20k hits/s, the majority of those came from machines in Vietnam or China. Some sites that do not have the expertise or resource to counter the attacks were forced to completely shut down
Gift cards only give the illusion of being thoughtful. I'm not sure why people are offended when receiving cash. There's really no up side compared to cash. It's less convenient for both the giver and receiver.
I guess it's a cultural thing (I'm Asian). I've always received cash from my parents and relatives and love it. I can spend any where, any amount, or not at all if I want to save it.
Now that is one way Apple will convince me to drop updwards of $600 despite owning a Macbook, iPhone, and a Kindle.
I'm a potential customer, I love their simple design and can't stop promoting Heroku to friends. I hope they succeed in solving those limitations and keep cost down in a reasonable range so that I can happily give them my money.