337 karma · joined April 7, 2015
Author of: wordsontheboards.com
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/r34117y; my proof: https://keybase.io/r34117y/sigs/tzSyMfjEaK4nTeFNXzFwZc0KQ2pQ7fNtO84ZWfqUF3w ]
Readability is mostly matter of habit. One reads easily what he/she is used to read.
Also: very clear and easy to follow language, props to the author. Cheers.
On the other side: we have a lot of taboos in the language/culture and not all of them are bad in terms of social well-being or happiness of individuals (the very simple example is that we sometimes lie to our kids). And I think that what we hide behind those taboos tends to emerge as "unnatural" or rather usually "supernatural". I also usually don't agree that we don't need a revolution in physics, but I understand it is so successful in creating all those working machines and we have to maintain them... ;)
- simulate a game using stockfish
- for each move (except few moves at the beginning) compare the move made by player with the list suggested by engine - if the move chosen by player is on the list generated by engine, than give that player some points (depending on the position of the move on the list)
- do some math considering player's ELO and some other stuff (I can't remember exactly).
Definitely not an ideal solution, but also open for improvements. Btw it wasn't my idea - chess players provided the exact algorithm, so it must have been known.
That's how I see it: to build the scaffolding on ratio, and start flying from there. But it's always important to be able to land back and not to get lost completely - because the outer space is simply uncomfortably unknown.
That's why amongst all the writers (or more generally - creators) I enjoy most those who have both solid knowledge and brave imagination.
1. Lifestyle. Less sport, more cars etc.
2. Politics. Testosterone behaviors are less and less rewarded (or even directly punished). Adaptive strategy is to produce it less.