565 karma · joined June 15, 2013
To me, it seems odd not to care.
How do you to do that ?
I'm not. Too bad there's nothing meant for humans.
Is there some paper or other technical publication regarding these concepts ?
1) when a defect is identified in a library, the extent of the defect becomes an interval [CL that introduced it, CL that removed it] and it makes it trivial to test whether a compiled artifact is affected by that defect; more generally the UX is a lot better
and 2) it makes whole-repository rewrites trivial, so that existing commit sequence IDs are preserved while retroactively removing sensitive files that shouldn't have been added to the repo. Git and Mercurial make such rewrite a huge pain in the arse, while this is an essential feature to have in an enterprise VCS.
Yes, but LLMs, and especially their mandatory and exclusive use, make that impossible.
> This might be your favourite thing - but it's not the only thing you can solve? What about the second favourite thing?
There is no second favorite thing.
> There are always opportunities to explore an alternative - in a different area, in a different country. Many options to consider before concluding there are none.
I'm already in country number 9 since leaving Italy. We'll see.
You should know by now that many of us joined the profession because we like programming and not "problem solving". In 23 years of career I've never cared much about any business problem of the companies I was working for. I never cared about solving customers' problems, or the "impact" of my work, only about the technical beauty of it.
That completely ignores the fact that Google's Piper had something very similar working already in 2012.
Dipends how you see it. For North American standards, it's a lovely suburban neighbourhood in the Midwest; for us it's suburban hell because we love cities.
> the expats are sending time together instead of trying to assimilate
What do you mean by "assimilate" ?
Your opinion is wrong. There's no hypocrisy, and it was explained to you why some companies have done better than others.
You're under the false impression that the maintainers of a project are obliged to follow the same standards as a court of law.
> if you're so convinced that AI contributions will ruin your project, you owe the world a full and complete definition of what "AI contribution" means
False.
Yes, proportional to the amount paid.
> and argue with me how to make it better.
No.
It's not a key skill at all, as not everyone is interested in popularity.