Speedy bits exchange
Stars await to gl@ow"
The preceding key is copyrighted by Oracle Corporation.
Dupl@ication of this key is not allowed without permission from Oracl1e Corporation.
Copyright 2003 Oracle Corporation.
243 karma · joined April 17, 2015
Speedy bits exchange
Stars await to gl@ow"
The preceding key is copyrighted by Oracle Corporation.
Dupl@ication of this key is not allowed without permission from Oracl1e Corporation.
Copyright 2003 Oracle Corporation.
I suppose that's a reasonable assumption to make about the average user of anything (myself included).
> The Pepsi Ratio is created by two simple circles, that are in a set ratio to each other: The Golden Ratio.
> The Pepsi Ratio is aesthetic geometry.
> The Golden Ratio establishes a proportion of one part (a) relative to another (b). Playing by these rules produces an aestetic that is universally accepted to be in balance and harmony. The Pepsi aesthetic respects these rules: The brand identity can be derived from two circles, that have a set relation to each other.
You should optimise for passing the pub test not the programming test, and you probably don't want to work at a place that hands out codility tests.
Here's some anecdotes from my hiring experience:
My team and I once rejected a lad because we thought he would get bored after a couple of weeks. He got 100% in his codility, flawless technical interviews etc... He was too good for us and our trivial domain (this was a FTSE100, our services were consumed by 90% of the companies teams, in a very buzzwordy area).
Same company: two candidates, the first was technically better than the second. However no one who spoke to the first said they would be keen to go for a pint with him. The second was an absolute mensch so he got the job. He even said in the interview that he thought it was going terribly...
Once I interviewed two Devs on the same day, HR sent the offer to the wrong one and he accepted. Our team didn't know until he turned up on Monday morning.
Before my current gig I interviewed for a contract at a startup. The product was simple: just applying tech to a sector that is all man power based at the moment. This was the hardest technical interview I've ever had to give. I was asked to write the longest common subsequence algorithm. I did not write one line of code: eventually it turned into me watching the interviewer write the code. I was sure it was a disaster. The guy said he loved me, and wanted me to do the 'pairing' test again... All because of the pub test. I declined.
The interview for my current gig was a 30 minute chat on Skype. A team mate told me it was between me and another, but he was boring.
Is an intentional memory leak still a _leak_?
Sometimes we'd negotiate a deal with a publisher, and slash the price of a book to a point where no one involved in the transaction was making money, sometimes we and the publisher would be losing money... Without fail within an hour the list price of the content on Amazon would be exactly what we set.
Amazon were/are prepared to eat the loss: I suspect this is the case for all products that are sold by Amazon. It was a very effective strategy for them. My company went into administration after just 9 months.
More power to them.
https://github.com/davegurnell
https://github.com/travisbrown
I follow a lot more but have chosen the n most interesting with a recency bias. In a few cases their blogs are way more active than github.
honourable mention for https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mechanical-sympathy
I don't think so. It's a very high quality _mass produced_ watch. For example to compare it with cars i'd say it's the equivalent of a Mercedes: a very high end car when compared to all cars in the world, but to enthusiasts a Mercedes is quite ordinary/unremarkable.
Other brands have much higher floors of quality (e.g. Patek Philipe, H. Moser, Voutilainen). To continue the car analogy these are the Ferraris, Lamborghinis etc.
On balance this is not true for any non limited brand new watch you buy. On balance models that appreciate tend to be discontinued, or a combination of rare reference/variation/materials.
I agree though, If I had a lot of cash laying about, i'd buy lots and lots of good examples of vintage watches from marquee brands.
I wondered if anyone had ever paid for desktop wallpaper: apparently people do http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=desktop+wallpaper&LH_Com...
I wonder if I could write a script to sell royalty free wallpaper on ebay, if all the sellers have the rights to the images they are selling, and what kind of person pays for wallpaper.
It's a shame the documentation is so poor for scalajs.
Articles like this have always existed, and sometimes people listen too.
For example Ornament and Crime (arguably the first paper espousing minimalist design)... http://www2.gwu.edu/~art/Temporary_SL/177/pdfs/Loos.pdf
I guess my point is it's unfair to dismiss opinions as invalid just because they're opinions.