34 karma · joined June 25, 2020
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Varieties_of_Religious_E...
If I wasn't such a fan of GrapheneOS, I would have ditched Pixel so fast.
Of course, I'd prefer advances in construction that would allow large amounts of full spectrum light to enter buildings, but that's only relevant to new construction.
I've been using it for over a year, 100% of the time, and love it. Great results and awesome functionality like weighting certain sites, AI summarization, etc.
I don't work for Kagi, I just seriously love it.
The majority of TV shows and movies that I watch are unavailable on streaming services. I know there's some more specialty streaming services for film these days, but besides that, it seems like its mostly well-known classics, anything mainstream from the past 20 years, or new releases that are available.
I solely credit piracy for enabling my appreciation of film and TV. I was never a big fan of either until I got access to a huge catalog and started watching classics that are not popular enough for streaming services to pickup.
It really should not be ingested except on rare occasions.
I think my issue with it has to do with too clean of a UI, not enough visual hierarchy, delineation between post replies, etc.
If anyone that has any pull is reading this, do trials with MXE. It's Ketamine on steroids.
Once it clicks, it is just as pleasurable as Ketamine, Methoxetamine, and other related ACHs.
One major difference between DXM and K is that DXM is quite stimulating whereas K is rather subdued and relaxing. If you don't have dissociative experience besides Ketamine, I'm not surprised that trying DXM after K would lead to an unpleasant experience.
Context: I've used a large amount of DXM as well as numerous ACH dissociatives.
There are a few major differences, but otherwise, the functionality is mostly similar.
Light is ridiculously important for mitochondrial health, and that effect on mitochondria is one of the main reasons sunlight is so necessary for optimal health. Fun fact, 75% of potential ATP production only results from light exposure, with only 25% from food. We run on light more than we do food (necessary nutrients and minerals aside).
I'm the one that mentioned him elsewhere in the thread. It's sad to me that he gets so much shit in scientific circles when he's quite reserved with making truth claims, instead making hypotheses that are unfortunately misaligned with current theories and so derided as pseudo-science or bullshit.