"Military Grade Encryption"
Immediate giveaway that its just PR...
470 karma · joined February 16, 2012
Immediate giveaway that its just PR...
> Software is done, like mowing the lawn is done.
We live in an imperfect world, if we want to keep ourselves safe and prevent bad actors out of our data/technology. Updates are a part of the process. You don't mow your lawn once, it has to be maintained. Which is the same as software.
This is something that we would be all better for if we could teach this concept to everybody so that updates are just a normal part of life.
launchctl list
Then you need to find where the plist files are (i.e. com.bluejeans.app.detector.plist).
You can disable an entry from launchctl list:
launchctl disable uid/<your user uid>/com.bluejeans.app.detector
You can also unload if you find the actual file
launchctl unload ~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.bluejeans.app.detector.plist
There were a couple differently named bluejeans agents.
By using different fuels. The fuel we currently use (enriched uranium) was chosen because we could also use it to build weapons. A different fuel (i.e. thorium, etc) could be used that couldn't be used in making weapons.
A different, but simple comparison would be to take minimum wage in 1968 ($1.60), adjust for inflation ($11.62 - 2017) and then compare to our current minimum wage ($7.25). So had minimum wage been tied to inflation, it would be right around $12/hr right now.
However if you need to 'expire' a JWT token early, there isn't a good way to do it. If your token has a JTI, then you could add a blacklist for that JTI (say in redis, with a TTL until the token's exp time). But that is left to the implementor.
There are a lot of really stupid mistakes made in a lot of these data disclosures that a competent IT team (and dev team) can prevent from happening. The current state of things is that there are hardly any consequences for losing people's data, just make a bulk purchase of credit monitoring and call it a day. This is cheaper than actually hiring the right people and implementing the correct processes.
This is needed, otherwise there is no real reason to actually protect personal data. Equifax losing the personal data for 50% of Americans should have resulted in major penalties due to the nature of their security.
The other requirements raise the cost of storing this data closer to the damage that can be done by the loss/theft of that data (from the perspective of the data subject).
We forget that people are extremely varied, there is room for everybody. An infinite God probably doesn't create only ~3 "right" ways of worshipping, living, serving, teaching, etc.
Some companies, however at a certain point, it becomes extremely difficult to not doing business with specific companies.
For example: describe how you would stop doing business with Equifax.
Also, how would you stop doing business with Google. You cannot simply stop using the search engine or Gmail. You would have to block (or stop using) websites using Google Analytics, stop using sites/services that use Google's Cloud, etc.
The most I had to do was to learn my password (into muscle memory) in both qwerty and dvorak (since corporate windows was qwerty until you login and then user settings take over).
Regardless, this is still shady.
Apple doesn't mandate any other company to change something with their product (Apple installs mail, calendar, music on their own iPhone, iPad, etc). They aren't using their market position to coerce another company to do something in Apple's favor. (as far as Android vs. iOS and the associated hardware phones and tablets).
We like building new things, from different angles, but in the end it seems like everything cycles through the same ideas.