I do all my dev in .NET on a mac, using Postgres and Sqlite only, so I don't relate to your experience at all. It's dead simple for me and I'm not even that good of a developer.
I do .NET dev exclusively on a mac completely within Visual Studio Code and it's by far the easiest and most enjoyable framework and ecosystem I've had the pleasure of working in. I couldn't be happier with it.
Please don’t misunderstand my comment, I wasn't trying to diminish the brilliant work you’ve done on HTMX, which I’ve personally benefited from. I could have probably worded it better than I did. I'm also not saying you _did_ misunderstand it, only asking that you please don't. I was just sharing an observation that I realize is not everyone’s experience. I’m still a fan + supporter, even though I now reach for JS more often because the pain of writing it has largely disappeared. I’m still not a fan of it by any means, but LLMs have been a major mitigator. I'm always happy to see the HTMX updates when they come out.
I've always been a fan and supporter of HTMX, but lately I've wondered how beneficial it is now that LLMs can generate JavaScript for us. HTMX was especially useful when I wrote JavaScript by hand because I appreciated its higher level of abstraction and simplicity. I also struggled to make it work with AlpineJS and eventually had to resort to plain JavaScript, which gave me finer control. Normally, switching to JavaScript would have been a hassle but since an LLM can produce it as easily as any other text, I’m less clear on HTMX’s advantage. I’ve been getting along fine without it. If computers didn’t write code for us, I would still choose HTMX, but now I find it hard to justify the trade‑off.
Haha that's awesome. Would love to hear more about your project. Share it on the boards if you want, I bet others would be interested too and you may be able to pick up a few new users! Hit me up anyway, always happen to swap notes, thanks for stopping by to check it out :]
I have a robust set of moderation tools built into the network and I check it several times per day. There is nothing automated setup yet because I don't need it. We have just under 200 members at the moment so this is working well. If the growth of the network ever outstrips my ability to moderate it effectively then I'll look at introducing new methods. So far, I've only had to delete 1 wall post and 1 thread, so it's very manageable.
Awesome, looking forward to seeing you on the boards. Yeah, we have a decent little group of active posters and we've been adding to that number slowly but consistently since I put it online a few weeks ago.
It's been fun and I've learned starting a community is a lot harder than it looks. Maybe I'll write a post on what I've learned sometime. TLDR and probably no surprise to most: making the software is the easy part.
Thank you! That's the idea, and even though its been a slow burn, the conversations have been interesting and rewarding. One of the funniest proof of concept so far was, someone asked how to route a guitar body to fit a new bridge on a network with maybe a dozen active people at the time. Within like a day, a total stranger with an actual woodshop and eight spare guitars showed up with real technical advice and offered him a discount on one of the guitars. Maybe it was a fluke, but it really struck me, and there have been a number of small interactions since that one that really remind me why I loved the early web so much.
I made it specifically to bring back what was amazing about the old internet, and do it as authentically as possible. takes inspiration from old internet messageboards, usenet, bbs, and pubnix hosts. it has sealed mail, boards, an rss reader, built-in media player, custom profiles, a links directory, and quite a bit more.
it's just a little hobby art project for me but i've really appreciated talking to like minded people in a calm space.
I can honestly say that as a paying customer, I'm getting a bit tired of being jerked around by this company. It's on again, off again. Snip snap snip. And by the way, telling people there's a deadline so they all scramble to use their "Fable allowances" before being cut off, only to then be told "just kidding, here's 5 more days" without getting a usage reset is just another frustrating and disappointing customer experience.
Seriously, all OAI needs to do at this point is just release GPT 5.6, have it be a solid model and then not jerk it out of the hands of their customers, and they're going to eat Anthropic's lunch.
I can't argue with a legit question and I suspect some others will feel the same. The answer (which you may not agree with) is that without a signup of any kind this would be a completely different thing. It wouldn't be a "semi-private network" for people who miss the old web or a community that rejects what's wrong with social media now. It'd be an open door anyone could pass through which would leave me no ability to moderate and basically nullifies the whole premise. The barrier is what lets it self-select. So the only rationale I can offer for why you should bother is if any of it resonates and you're curious whether you'd like it, come check it out. If not, no hard feelings here.
My experience has been the appetite suppression goes down after a while but doesn’t go away entirely. With each change in dose there’s always a more pronounced effect in the beginning. I don’t take it for weight loss though, I take it for T2 and my A1C is a 4.3 so it works very well for that and it’s unlikely I’ll change doses again because it’s well controlled.