160 karma · joined June 2, 2015
This is the key attitude to gauging whether it's worth sticking it out in academia. I tell people you really need to be 'obsessed' with science (indeed, obsession is really a key concept: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riaYwt0gf20). Just being interested in problem-solving isn't close to enough to put up with the low pay and rather tough working conditions. There's lots of interesting problems out there in industry.
Setting up a GPO to push Microsoft updates to clients in an AD domain, I spent ~8 hours debugging why the clients couldn't connect to the WSUS server. It turned out that there was trailing whitespace in the server URL text field that was getting parsed.
As a side note, this type of story IMO doesn't actually play that well in interview situations.
These sorts of discoveries really push towards a re-evaluation of Lamarck's thought, frankly.
Nabokov's character development and psychological penetration don't hold a candle to Dostoyevsky's though.