12,722 karma · joined March 16, 2009
gotyoufromhackernews@freytag.org
See the Oct 29, Nov 5, and Nov 12th episodes so far.
See the Oct 29, Nov 5, and Nov 12th episodes so far.
Nuclear weapons are not very useful when you have good intelligence and a distributed ability to delivey vast amounts of precious-guided weapons.
When the iron is burnt are they going to do with pure oxygen? Otherwise they'll get pollutants like nitrogen dioxide, possibly ozone. And the 0.5% not burnt will also become a pollutant unless carefully removed in some smokestack scrubber.
Or is this 'burning' to occur some kind of iron fuel cell? How would they liquidize the iron which is quite heavy?
Lastly, iron is heavy. Moving reduced iron could be expensive and dangerous.
Still, if sufficiently close to the renewable source this could provide much needed load leveling for intermittent sources.
Elmish.WPF, FParsec, so much there and still things to do...like better development tooling with VS Studio Pro.
If it were a sure thing it wouldn't be a challenge or quite as interesting.
This WSU post advocates for hydrogen's relative safety: https://web.archive.org/web/20210809163754/https://hydrogen....
“Look behind. Remember thou art mortal. Remember you must die!”
The slave served to remind the victor at the peak of glory, this god-like adoration would soon end, while the truth of his mortality remained. '
That story is given here in the section titled "Romans": https://dailystoic.com/history-of-memento-mori/
This might be better than mathematical constructs which conceivably do not require technology, "just" thought to discover.
CATO repeatedly gets this wrong.
Investment delivered to increase the productivity of those currently unlikely to be productive will result in significant GDP growth.
The problem lies in government subsidies to already productive businesses and demographic groups that produce relatively small marginal growth for their investment. The Trump tax cut is the latest example of such a misallocation of capital.
Acknowledging the realities of increases in lifespan and extended quality of life along with a strong public campaign against age discrimination would greatly increase the productivity of a significant sector of the population while incurring relatively little additional training costs. This would then justify raising the Social Security retirement age with consequential decreases in the cost of that entitlement program.
These changes to budget priorities become vital if we are to avoid significant additional borrowing in the new high-interest environment.
Of course, as time marches on boomers will leave the Medicare and Social Security system resulting in a significant reduction in costs. The possibility of a surplus in a little over a decade is conceivable.