Perhaps then inventors of promising ideas should make multiple attempts at popularizing their ideas if they care about association, multiple attempts at explaining why the idea is important and demonstrations of killer applications.
577 karma · joined October 21, 2015
The HBS method to get to 3.5X isn’t sensible (as the author points out, not everyone would build) but the truth is somewhere in-between.
The COGS of software would be significantly higher if there was no OSS. But everyone knows that already. I don’t think any new information has been created here.
No I don’t think so. You probably want n8n if you’re keen on self-hosting.
Would definitely give it a try if you’re looking to automate Yahoo Pipes style.
I have no affiliation to them, just a happy user
It currently has 882 stars and I think a few people at least are enjoying using it.
It has an RSS feed with full articles available. I understand your desire to limit JS.
So neither it seems. Whatever the website does when a user doesn’t make a choice.
The difference is packaging it as a consumable PyPI package that can easily be used in a project (they even call out for separating this out into a stand alone project but that they lack the time to do so: https://docs.sweep.dev/blogs/chunking-2m-files#future- )
In addition, we expand and fix the implementation, for example it now supports limiting on token count instead of character count, and we fix some white space inconsistencies in parsing/chunk reconstruction.
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools/console/utilities...
I’ll just leave this here.
Also, you can remove the tediousness of Twitter feed scrolling because AI will make it easy to just ask for specific knowledge (if you know what you're looking for) or perform discovery based searching (what are some of the interesting ways in which people are using LangChain in this community). This is wild!