rienbdj

If you like building but have no capital you might release something like this that works.

Students? The couldn’t even write the essay!

It’s harder and less lucrative than short social media spots.

What’s wrong with node? Genuine question

It’s easier to imagine a super power than the end of capitalism, apparently.

This blog post annoys me a little. Not the post itself - it’s great - but how it has been used to prop up thousands of lazy arguments against innovations over the years.

The noise pollution can be awful.

If you’re not going so far, can an eMTB be even more practical?

This sounds like a similar approach to OxCaml

F# is good because it can easily fetch and import third party dependencies in a script.

Flying is usually the cheapest and quickest option. Madness!

Anyone know why? Can’t CC run on any JS runtime?

I’ve always found this style ugly but so much clearer than modern UIs!

And now letterboxed is eating their lunch.

OCaml already starts form a memory safe base being GCd?

Can selectively turn off the borrow check for dev builds?

Seems like Rust unsafe could be improved without changing the language design.

Anyone know a good into to queuing theory?

Masters programs are much less competitive than undergrad. It’ll still be there.

Take the job. You can do the masters after. The job offer might not still be there.

Ask HN: add a flag for articles about AI?

I would love to see Elm adopt an effects system as an answer to React hooks.

Not sure how one can be healthy and sedentary.

Plus the only group with any disposable incomes increasingly becomes the super rich. So all the support functions of this… restaurants, high end boutiques, wellness clinics, tailors, … start to cluster. The servant class then push prices up further by trying to live a commutable distance to work.

What is a beam solver?

Were you able to rig up the solver to the running game?

Curious what this looks like!

Cool game.

Seeing as this is HN, please can you talk tech stack?

In the early days of music streaming, many of the entrants were seeding their service with vast libraries of pirated content. The winners cut deals with the copyright holders and then went after the rest.

I have a theory that LLM generated code in a highly modular style (simple data, pure functions) will be easier to “recover” by a human team when the LLM gets muddled. So Haskell, basically.

Looks like a nice language. They market it as a Rust-like looks more like an ML to me.

> all that matters is that the properties of the system are validated

I don’t think this is possible in practice without leaning on the stability of the code base.

Not a bad solution at all. It does require some discipline to write deterministic templates etc. though.