11,330 karma · joined August 21, 2017
Pictures in menus just vaguely resembling the actual dish. Dunno what value the authors think a made up picture provides except for tourist traps. Like, I wont trust your menu twice.
I didn't anticipate McDonalds menu pictures becoming in the authentic and informative range of menus.
Is Softbank making any money or just dissipating Alibaba gains?
Seems like about 3 collisions per 100 million pictures. If everyone have 1000 pictures that is 3 collisions per 100 000 users.
Raiding 2 people in my city for made up CSAM pictures would be way to high false positive rate.
But you can also make any picture match a CSAM hash by adding picked noise.
A dice throw and some chitchat would be better recruiting.
Similar confusion on HN comments about SaaS UX arise when there is AB testing and some are victims and some are not.
Like what is the point of making grinding in games more efficient as you remove the fun and social aspect and the advantage of organizing a party.
In Data 2 the skill level shifted upwards enourmously for pro players and I feel also for normal players. But the scene also got kinda lame and boring with too optimized strategies.
The faking part would be in who is blamed and what country to bomb etc.
Anyways it is a bad trade off for the users to make and most don't even know they areaking it.
Equity is mostly not handed out in a way that grants power but the opposite to tie the dev to the workplace. Some lottery tickets are winners though.
Dunno why there was such resistance from the owning class afterwards with return to office mandates.
Someone here on HN crowned Sam Altman as a "sociopat sociapat" i.e. playing sociopats for money. I think that was the insight of years for me.
Battle Royal explodeing collars for the working class in his doomsday bunker. Or was that Seth of Reddit?
It is a especially visible concept in the new tech sector war industry. Edgelord as a Service.