454 karma · joined February 9, 2013
Adyen had a better story for omni-channel commerce with card present, but they made us integrate with COM. COM! Apparently they have card present readers coming out that allow you to send some JSON.
In the end after hundreds of hours invested in it, we ditched Adyen. We did have it running in production, BTW. Their pricing was not any cheaper than we got from stripe with interchange plus.
Sounds like equity in this company is really not worth that much because the company has yet to find a viable foothold after 4 years. If no investor will pay a reasonable amount for the equity, why do you believe it is worth anything? The ICO seems like a move out of desperation.
My advice would be to look for another opportunity while you're still gainfully employed. You may get into another opportunity with true growth potential.
He does bring up some great points regarding transaction throughput and the team productivity.
It seems like lightning network is the tool to get a lot of cheap, fast transactions done via bitcoin and turn it into a really useful viable currency.
However, that has taken a long time just to get to test mode. Much of the fate of bitcoin is tied to that github repository and pull requests. There has never been another open source software project with this much money riding on it. Can this team continue to deliver value?
There are other concerns like deflationary spirals, volatility, etc., but my bet on bitcoin is largely a bet on the dev team and whether or not useful pull requests get created & merged and what that velocity is.
Lighting network is also distributed, you don't need a direct channel between you and another party to pay them. You just have to find a route.
I think that is the key here, Internet media helped them disseminate their message very rapidly.
I would also argue, easy access to capital was very important. Once that original video went viral, they had to really pour on the online ad-spend to acquire customers. Seeing as how their customer acquisition costs are high, the more customers they got, the more money they lost every month! Capital is key!
They were wildly successful before they were on AWS. I believe they started off on magento, then drupal before writing their own software (once they were having a lot of success).
They don't use Amazon for fulfillment. They used some other 3PL's and are now leasing and running their own distribution centers. In the beginning, Dubin was packing those razors up in his living room!
Source: founder a close personal friend.
In California there is a "gross receipts tax" based on revenue for an LLC. Do over a million dollars? Pay $6,000 in LLC Fees. Fine for a software co or a law firm not a huge deal. Ecommerce can be a crazy low margin business though and many Stripe customers could get hurt.
http://www.sandiegobusinesslawyerblog.com/2013/05/california...
I did buy an MS Surface and it was by far the best PC experience I ever had, however they don't make a keyboard cover with a touch-stick, that's the only reason I went back to a ThinkPad.
Those factories should be able to sell directly to the consumer via the Amazon marketplace, but there's a lot of hurdles for them. And they're certainly not equipped to run their own Shopify store.
If Amazon can reduce this friction (and I think they can) I expect the prices of a lot of commodity types of goods (like salad bowls or bike pumps) to drop significantly.
Regardless if they are blocking a lot or a little, they all let way too many fishy charges go through. They are just not incentivized to police fraud because in e-commerce its you who are on the hook for the charge back, not the bank or credit card company.
You cannot rely on your merchant bank (Stripe or anyone else) to do your fraud protection. You will get eaten alive.
They have copied them to such a degree with their name and their advertising it is creating confusion in the marketplace. And that's kind of a litmus test for trademark infringement from what I remember in my business law classes.
It consistently out-performs all the other extremely high end coffee houses I have been to. There is an Intelligentsia in my neighborhood where several of the baristas have coffee beans tattooed on their arms and hands as a symbol of their dedication to the craft, yet they cannot produce a better cup of coffee made by this machine at than the "McDonalds" of coffee houses. Pretty surprising.
Their average customer is a person that sees all the big blockbuster movies. They are not discerning about what they see and they are not critical viewers.
Comparing these people's reviews to the professionals on Rotten Tomatoes is a little silly. As mentioned, Fandango has no motive to reduce the ratings, the more "must see" movies there are, the more money they make.
edit having read more of this article now, I see the issue with Fandango's rounding. Pretty lame.
Should they only change the default browser to edge if it was IE before?
Doesn't seem fair to them...