10,636 karma · joined February 5, 2019
[hackernwsbdfgijlmopqtuvxyz]X[jackdwlvemybigsphnxofqurtz]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powder_metallurgy
definitely a tech worth maintaining.
that means, a game of demo derby with a satellite near its deorbiting window anyway, is efficient, vs launching a weapons platform to start taking potshots, or spraying tetsubishi in orbit.
take note, both styles require a team, this is not a solo venture if your in business you need cover and extraction, and supports, like a stage magician.
this affects federal law, not municipal or state law, so you could get in trouble for shorties, or suppressors from local LEO.
this is primarily about what amounts to abdication of NFA, and effort likewise for GCA.
this doesnt apply for machine guns [automatic] or destructive devices.
so FEDERALLY no taxes on short barrel or suppressor, non-prohibited persons can possess these things, manufacture for own personal use. gunsmiths may transfer these items[sell+paperwork] to any non-prohibited person, and perhaps maybe in a while you may be able to cut down a rifle to pistol size.
LOCALLY make sure you are extremely clear, on what your state or muni, will allow. this is only a step back by the feds, not others.
even vending operators understand the idea that a machine left in service while in deficient state, is a lose lose scenario. if you let it go empty of change, or product, or dispense substitutions whithout prior warnings, the user looses a buck or two, the operator loses substantially more, thus the service maintenance model of extract and replace, rather than continue to vend in a default, saves money and preserves chattels.
never mind that some one broke into the retailers location and stole a truck load!
https://www.foxchase.org/news/cracking-undruggable-code-fox-...
https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/abstract/S1097-2765(26)0...
A transposable element partook of vertical gene flow to a conspecific expression system.
https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2026/09/new-type-human-jump...
maybe in the short term, and if thier app store is a loss leader.
the better direction in my opinion, is the mutual reinforcement of coupled dynamic systems, that ends up giving us metabolism.
the gist is that an organ is localized structure you can point towards, where as a diffused system, such as nervous system , requires a sweep of the hand, as it is distrubuted over the volume of the organism.
the "common function" is the floor of the definition.
what is clear from embryological study is that neural tissue is derived from communication between two embryonic cell plates, and the result is modified based on spatially based inductive signal consequences for gene regulation.
these are not two separately derived organs later fusing to one mass, these are different regions of the same mass having different consequences of inductive signal.
wikipedia being what it is, on par with secondary literature gives an overview of brain and nervous system origin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_nervous_sys...
the primary discipline is embryology, and if you view the progression from cellular to somatic, it is quite clear that structure of nervous system, and brain are early events during organogenesis, and are derived from contact and signalling between cellular plates. there is a gradient derived signal, that induces disparate potency of genetic expression. there is however, not , two individual centers of cellular genesis, all neural cells are derived from same cell cell interaction, and induced to take a constrained set of functionalities based on signal amplitudes.
https://embryology.oit.duke.edu/neuro/neuro.html
the original research in question did not discover a two brain merger, thats a tragic misinterpretation that is doing disservice, and is not even the claim of the research.
the discovery is the difference in genetic expression that required a different cultural regime for hindbrain neurons invitro. previously the paradigm was that forebrain, and hindbrain required almost similar culture, and this discovery allows realization of that fact, leading to a cultural regime promoting invitro hindbrain neuroculture.
this is thier claim :
“We’ve shown for the first time that the front of the brain arises from a totally different progenitor cell than the back of the brain,” said Kyle Loh, PhD, associate professor of developmental biology. “Our discovery means that we can now grow neurons from the back of the brain, the hindbrain, in a petri dish and study their functions.”
in translation, the two regions of the brain develop from different expressive states of the progenitor populations. the problem was difficulty culturing cerebellar neurons, due to a unrecognized disparity in genetic expressivity. the neurons were being manipulated as if they were running the same config.sys, and that was not the case. this work elucidates that fact and recognizes it as essential, to invitro culture of "hindbrain" neurons.
The findings were published in Nature Neuroscience Sept. 18. Loh is the senior author. Graduate students Carolyn Dundes and Rayyan Jokhai are co-first authors of the research.
"Two parallel neural ectoderm progenitors contribute to the developing brain"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02433-7
these are not separate organs these are separate "stem cell" populations.
under such a statement as submitted all of our organs that derive from varied populations of expressive constituency, would be amalgams of more than one organ.
most residential wifi are not very secure, put the black hat on for a second, then send a message telling a user there is something they cant have; cant do; or will lose, unless they log in, or sign in. then you see the joe password, and many times its the same password for everything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootk...