4 karma · joined May 13, 2012
Do you think this is still possible?
Fully agree.
>> Examples: darklang.com, webflow.com, retool.com, modulz.com, divjoy.com
To me, those look still very much focused on the software engineer.
My preference is rather something like Oracle APEX or Atlassian Jira.
Jira already provides many generic features that are typically used in custom, corporate applications: - UI with forms, tables, sorting, filtering - queries - Workflow editor and workflow engine - notifications - csv file import / export - mobile client
"No offense: We are committed to not knowingly undermining the security of the online environment, and to protecting against efforts to tamper with our products and services."
Signatories include ATLASSIAN (Jira) | CLOUDFLARE | FACEBOOK | GITHUB | GITLAB | LINKEDIN | MICROSOFT | ORACLE | HP | ....
I wonder why companies like Google, Amazon, Apple and Alibaba do not sign? Is it an indication that they are tampering and attacking?
2 years ago I changed my opinion. We've developed two different user interfaces for trading at the same time. One with HTML5, Typescript, Angular, WebSockets, and the other one with JavaFX. The developement of the JavaFX based application was way cheaper, faster, pleased users more (due to multi-window!) and had by an order of magnitude fewer glitches in the UI. (But the web application was prettier).
So the title of the whole article is totally misleading. It has nothing to do with Tweets & Twitter.
Maybe the same bot (script) has done dozens other trades (false positives) at a loss before.
Two interesting projects to mitigate this: Terms of Service; Didn't Read: https://tosdr.org/
Maidsafe (Distributed encrypted Internet) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdGH40oUVDY#t=71
That's not the way Switerland's politicians think. Swiss politics is dominated by lawyers, farmers and other lobbyists.