1,311 karma · joined June 13, 2012
Transport might be a better part of the explanation, but more because of the lack of investment in decent transportation beyond London (the recent HS2 cancellation being one example).
For me, I suspect poor GDP performance is due to a lack of investment/success in manufacturing and science, in part because of an over-emphasis on the city/finance and other (in-part) rent-seeking activities which has sucked in talent and energy, but also because of a general incompetence of government over the last 20 years.
It's not clear from your post what it is about tech that is demotivating you and without that it is hard to give good advice. But I'd caution against just leaving without having some clarity about what is next - i.e. discerning a positive pull. It may well be that your challenges/frustrations are only tangentially related to tech itself - could it be social, mental health, team/company, etc?
Flexible or part-time working is also something to explore - especially as you are not struggling financially. I've done variously 4 days or 9/10 days for the last 5 years or so and that's allowed me to do some volunteering on the off day, which has been a great change from sitting in front of a screen - as it's been physical and people-focused.
A sabbatical is another option. Take 3 or 6 months off, do something different, and you may rediscover a bit of passion for tech or otherwise figure out what you want to do next.
I also recommend chatting to friends/people you trust who know you well and might be able to give some wisdom/help you understand where the frustration is coming from.
And of course, if you do leave tech, you can always jump back in!
But in any case, I wonder if your example is not so strong - after all, the independent CB was only enabled by democractically-elected representatives voting for it.
Edit: along with the authors own blog explaining their take: https://kerkour.com/supply-chain-attacks-and-backdoored-depe....
The short version is, it's better to have a centralised (though proxyable, and opt-outable) central store of hashes of module content, but then provide flexibility over distribution. The concern is that a central package manager adds complexity and opportunity for security vulnerabilities without adding much value.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/bank-overground/2020/why-are...
(In 2020, more than half of new mortgages were fixed for 5 years or more.)
I'm just in the process of retrofitting this to my old home (which definitely has elements of 'sick house' syndrome at the moment).
It's not that cheap, and can be tricky to retrofit - usually alongside improving airtightness and insulation - but is one way to dramatically improve air quality in a building, especially over colder months.
If product, then I (as a developer) want you to contribute things that I can't do (or don't have time to do):
* detailed market-analysis of competitors/features etc. * stakeholder research * good numerics/understanding of MVT tests and how to evaluate results, avoiding common causes of bias
I don't want us to vote on features, I want you to have a solid evidence-based approach to prioritise product changes.
I also want you to:
* know the product better than anyone else, including me (if things are only specified in code/buried than that needs fixing) * showcase your research/evidence/learnings to the team regularly * collaborate closely with devs/leads/dev manager to balance tech tasks with new features
I had thought most of London had access to really good options here but obviously I was wrong!
This works really well and doesn't involve selling the family silver.
Inequality in society, driven by poor early family life and environment for many (leading to many issues including poor education) is a real problem for 'the West', and especially the US.
Now, in practice, it might be more accurate to call these markets oligopolies (certainly cloud infrastructure is more this), but this still leaves a few companies with dramatic power over important parts of society.
And monopoly is a problem for the government to solve; these companies aren't 'evil' (any more than most others at least, except in virtue of their size), and the lasting solution is not to try and shame them or call them out here or claim victimhood (as the right has done) - though exercising voice can work as a short term tactic sometimes.
But, one obvious impact will be labour supply. Fewer European area devs will come to the UK, which will make things less attractive for big tech companies.
The trick is you have to change at Stockwell onto the Victoria Line.
Nb. I did almost this journey every day pre-lockdown and the numbers are accurate for me at least.
* we're using projects internally and don't want the hassle of rewriting import paths when making backwards-incompatible changes
* we don't want to just give up on semver and publish breaking changing on the v0/1 numbering scheme
I feel like you have to pick one. If it's the first, then it's actually a positive thing that explicit import path rewrites are needed in my mind at least.