258 karma · joined March 28, 2015
When the patch went out 9 days ago [1], many vulnerability researchers were able to look at it and identify the root cause within minutes. Exploits started going out over a week ago before it was publicly disclosed and the CVE was released. Good security orgs that can hire skilled vulnerability researchers started patching on December 6th/7th/8th. All the chaos started on December 9th when people started leaking the poc on twitter.
The same thing happens to google chrome when they release a patch for a security vulnerability. Very skilled researchers can produce a POC and exploit given the patch alone [2]
[1] https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/d82b47c
[2] https://blog.exodusintel.com/2019/09/09/patch-gapping-chrome...
It's really hard for vulnerabilities as simple as this one to stay under wraps. When the patch went out 9 days ago [1], many vulnerability researchers were able to look at it and identify the root cause within minutes. Exploits started going out over a week ago before the CVE was released. Good security orgs that can hire skilled vulnerability researchers started patching on December 6th/7th/8th. All the chaos started on December 9th when people started leaking the poc on twitter.
The same thing happens to google chrome when they release a patch for a security vulnerability. Very skilled researchers can produce a POC and exploit given the patch alone [2]
The same thing happens even with embargoes like the one you describe in place.
[1] https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/d82b47c [2] https://blog.exodusintel.com/2019/09/09/patch-gapping-chrome...
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/chromium-...
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/12/apacolypse-no...
It also has <h1>What could possibly go wrong.</h1> go wrong in the default editor source.
Was it irresponsible? Yes zq should have put a warning for sure. Still a cool experiment. Twitch Plays Pokemon with bigger repercussions.