1,652 karma · joined January 5, 2011
Perfectly proving my point. It's a meaningless argument built on vibes that every reader interprets differently.
https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/super-bowl-revealed-a...
Students telegraphing to the film world that a coming generation of consumers simply won't be going to the theatre. The article is framed as a tragedy about the students, but it's actually a tragedy about the professors and institution of moviegoing.
An alternative read is that AI in its current form can produce such unpredictable results they're content for now to use Google as a scapegoat for any oddities.
An alternative read is that AI in its current form can produce such unpredictable results they're content for now to use Google as a scapegoat for any oddities.
find it works best when the conversation is less outward ("how would you solve healthcare in America?") and more inward ("how do you stay motivated when it feels like everything is working against you?") where each person's personal experience and sharing doesn't have to be directly relevant to you, but you can interpret your own thoughts/feelings/experiences through a different lens.