970 karma · joined December 6, 2016
If you haven't heard of the just world fallacy, it might be worth looking into.
I think it's convenient to say that a massive organization is doing well only because of that leader and not, at least occasionally, despite that leader.
Moreover, a lot of educated people understand that graphs have incredibly complex behavior and can't be well understood from the "first" node a stimulus enters through and yet we are quick to laud Jobs for all of the successes of his network; it's like this insane pyramid scheme of credit attribution.
I'm not comfortable working for any company who treats any of their employees like garbage.
Frankly, I don't get the hype. I've interviewed FAANG engineers and have given a thumbs down almost as often as I did for engineers from other companies.
My new P15 still has a modular gpu and, IIRC, has easy access to most components by removing the back cover.
I don't see a use for religion other than to allow people to skirt their responsibility in having/maintaining a mature line of empathy.
(I don't want to get injured by a ship in disrepair)
Every manager (as well as a few colleagues) has tried to get me to come back so far. A couple have recommended me to lead the tech side of their friend's (well-funded) startups long after I left.
I wouldn't ever do it again though unless it was explicitly asked for. Stressing about getting fired in the initial weeks after getting hired (or during a boss change) just isn't worth it.
Do you think it's possible they're mistaking gunfire with fireworks? There are plenty of fireworks here.
I know I rely on my family and friends to do so. Conversely, I know I'm able to do so with them and they love me just the same.
I mean, it's a trope at this point in American media where your loved one can slap your face hard to give you a reality check. I've never personally had that happen but to say the culture is a culture of enablers doesn't seem well supported.
I guarantee you they do. I guarantee you I know people with PhDs in neuroscience who've been asked their SAT scores.
I guarantee you that Boeing or some other major defense contractor (it's hard to keep track with how many were on campus) has made it well known at my school that if you graduate with a 3.7, you automatically get a job.
I guarantee you that when a school like mine does grade deflation to the point where the average engineer gets a 2.7, the people who cheat make it such that the people who didn't cheat struggle to find a job. Then when they do find a job their success is delayed substantially.
I guarantee you that people who already study their ass off for tests also cheat so that they guarantee that A. They also guarantee what would have been an A ends up as a B. There are only so many spots at top universities, guess who those spots go to.
Guess what happens to a school's reputation when their "best and brightest" end up being idiots in the workplace. Guess how hard it is for the smart ones who didn't cheat to find a good job.
Cheating does a lot more damage than you give it credit for.
(I've also met a lot of brilliant people that didn't cheat but there are far more smart people who do than don't)
I even went a step further with how involved with physics I was during the EE degree and specialized in RF; hardly any of that was covered in my physics degree.
I think the programming community largely agrees that indenting is good. If something is forcing you to do something that is good, then it definitely doesn't fall into the category of "never good."
I can't think of a single time in the nearly 10 years of using Python daily that made me want it to operate differently w.r.t. indenting.
I mean, I worked at a medium sized medical device company (10,000+ people) (who was considered the gold standard of their industry in many respects) where you would be hard pressed to find a single person that wrote a lot of code who had anything but a Physics, EE or CpE degree; I honestly can't remember a single person who had a CS degree despite being on an algorithms team.
I can't even remember a single person at the scientific device company I worked at where their algorithms team had anything but PhDs in Physics.