2,396 karma · joined June 10, 2009
Coal progress looks great but feels contradictory with the New Scientist link. Not a lot of people talking about the large gas dependency...
* On the one hand, supposedly one of the best users of clean energy (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-48711649). Side question: where does it all come from? The UK doesn't have a lot of sunshine, nor do I see a lot of wind farms compared to other EU countries. Maybe north and around the coast? Wind seems likely given all the news about record wind output when speeds pick up. Wikipedia's number for zero-carbon production seem quite different than BBC's though.
* Government makes a vague declaration for the distant future, but Chancellor says we can't afford to do it.
* UK criticized for coal subsidies and lack of transparency (https://www.newscientist.com/article/2130231-uk-government-s...)
GBPUSD spot is 0.002% wide (so you’d expect to pay ~0.001% for a single, instant transaction up to several million). It’s not actually too difficult to access this through a brokerage.
That said, if you could really get 0.1% from them it’d probably be considered good at retail.
It doesn’t really appear to be very nefarious, nor an advertising issue. Maybe an unintentional or neglectful privacy issue at worst, in the case of an already-stolen phone.
On the other hand, piping and redirection are relatively uncommon outside of the shell. There is certainly a clearer mental distinction for me between "I am in shell" and "I am not in shell" than "I should double star".
I have only ever used it outside of 30 days, and the "yay! look what we are forcing on you at a large price increase" email is not especially welcome anyway.
It may well be the case that this was never intended as a formal contract, but I am responding to the assertion that there was no way for it to be. I stand by the claim: the issue is authority/power, not the necessary legal means.
https://www.med.upenn.edu/bbl/philadelphianeurodevelopmental...
I don’t see any mention of twins here or on JAMA, although I can’t access the full text currently.
The cost/benefit of adding internal quality is only apparent over the entire lifetime of the product. If the product life is short, or only simple features are added, or not many of them, or the original design is a good fit for the feature scope in the future, you may never see sufficient benefit and the internal quality will be a net cost.
I'd grant that people tend to underestimate product lifetime and future complexity (perhaps wilfully, in some situations). A lot of people simply say "let's cut corners". I don't think there's a failure to explain to them that cutting corners can have downsides, as the article suggests. Everybody knows that. It is not unique to software, either.
I don't think 35% at fixed frequency makes sense; 35% is the frequency boost (with power savings too).
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Features/Form_Autofill#Chil...
https://github.com/orgs/FirefoxGraphics/projects/1
I assume due to driver issues?
"Boiling a kettle, for example, takes around two kilowatts."
I guess that was a very small amount of water or it was already pretty hot.