Reference?
122 karma · joined May 12, 2013
Reference?
No, this is just a common misconception. If you look at the history of rulings from east Texas, you will see they invalidate a higher percentage of patents than other courts in the US. East Texas just implemented rules on length of filings and length of arguments to cut out most of the crap out of patent cases, making the process cheaper and faster for both sides.
So, if you have an iffy patent, and you want to have the best odds of winning, don't file in east Texas. But expect to pay a lot more.
I guess the east Texas model is bad for lawyers who file thousands of pages of "supporting material", and then get paid $200/hr to read it. But how much of this supporting material was actually relevant? Not much, which is why the judge in east Texas was able to enforce page limits.
The east Texas model is the right way to rule on patent cases. But the patent system needs to be supported by better laws.
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/06/28Bob-Mansfield-Appl...
Chet: "Get out the drool cup!" Erik: "In use, my friend! Drooool!" Chet: "Then break out the scraper, because someone's gonna have to scrape my jaw off the floor!" Erik: "That's also in use, to scrape my spooge off the monitor! Spoooge!" Chet: "Ouch! Fetch me my eye medicine, because I have an eyeache from watching a whole mixed bag of eye candy!" Erik: "All of the eye medicine's already in my eye! I'm done with the scraper, though."
Google has been using AngularJS for some new sites.
But no matter how you do it, single page apps usually result in a heavily minified representation.