Comparison with other models.
548 karma · joined March 8, 2020
Comparison with other models.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO2I3ueVQrk&lc=UgxRXtipA3QbA...
tldr; it's not as good as opus 5.5
https://youtu.be/NO2I3ueVQrk?is=OWezDVBL3l2EHMbR
Tldr; it's about as good as sol. Opus 5.5 is still generally the best though carbon can be very good.
As a doctor I would say this is incorrect.
As he says, he doesn't have much time to research the entire book.
You think he has "weeks" to write it up for others?
I imagine there are thousands of interesting projects people are doing solo and can't be bothered creating website to share with others for.
If AI can do this- fantastic! Let people moan if they can't see the positives of this. He's not trying to win an award or is paid to create a site for the public.
1 point by scrollop 0 minutes ago | parent | next | edit | delete [–]
"The problem with AI generated content is, it tells me you didn't care enough about the work to do it yourself."
It may be the translation, however, this project is a passion for him. I would guess the passion is the book itself, and though he wants to share his passion, I imagine creating the actual page for others is tedious compared to the work of discovering the book. I have had the same issue.
If an AI can save you time so you can continue with your passion, I say go for it. No one has paid you to create the page, he's not vying for an award. If people are interested they can read it.
There are likely many people out there doing remarkable work but they can't be bothered creating a website to share with others.
If AI can do that, fantastic - even though some people will moan. There are always people who complain.
If an AI can save you time so you can continue with your passion, I say go for it. No one has paid you to create the page, he's not vying for an award. If people are interested they can read it.
"If an author doesn’t have time to write. Why should I give up my time to read?"
Perhaps he is taking the time to translate it for you, otherwise you'd have to do it yourself.
You trust anything he says?
I would say meta and google definitely are. xAI? Probaly. The others? Perhaps. Perhaps Anthropic less than the others?
https://www.bridgebench.ai/nerf-bench
https://marginlab.ai/trackers/claude-code/ https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/
Lot's of people staring at computers moving money and ious around complicated networks within complicated rules making money making money making money.
Really progressing humanity forward :/
Much less interesting.
Prepare to lose essentially unlimited chat mode.
I imagine many will move to claude, as I will (return), unless anthropic makes more blunders.
Random link I found looking for the twitter post
https://pasqualepillitteri.it/en/news/21024/openai-merge-cha...
https://www.bridgebench.ai/nerf-bench
https://marginlab.ai/trackers/claude-code/ https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/
https://marginlab.ai/trackers/claude-code/
This site has been documenting it for a while
this one has been around for over a year
Luckily it's not a mistake as now we have access to . . . dots.
(and sol 6.1, it seems)
If you listen closely, you may hear them squawking in annoyance after each announcement.
The Samsara of AI subscriptions.
It's everyones.
I imagine some people have their own personal in depth benchmarks they could do this for.