698 karma · joined June 13, 2009
ciobaca.ro profs.info.uaic.ro/~stefan.ciobaca
In my spare time, I've developed NoThree - a puzzle game for Android.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ovaludi.nothree.android
All of the elided content in the above quote is presumably good stuff Amazon did for the commenter.
It is my impression that the commenter has just admited to being driven by personal experience (instead of objectively judging) when he said that Amazon removing an "illegal" book from the Kindle is not unjust.
And it definitely has to do with the circles you hang around in. As a programmer you're more likely to be in a rather smart circle.
Recognizable is not the same thing as acceptable. For example, some undecidable languages are recognizable by Turing machines.
You can leave it as an exercise for anyone you wish, but your assertion (existance of a simple metaproof that there is [a proof of either P=NP or P!=NP]) is false. I base my assertion about your assertion on the fact that about 40 years of research has not produced such a metaproof.
I think the funniest thing is them bashing ebook publishers for trying to imitate the worst parts of books (i.e. turning pages) and then have them publish the magazine in pdf format.
Otherwise, I like their approach. I think their vision of e-publishing is one of the best in the industry; when I get some more free time, I'll go and see which of their non-DRM-ed books I could use.
If you believe that MS is pushing open standard, you are at best naive.
For example I upvote what I like/agree with. I downvote stupid or wrong stuff.
That being said, I think the HN community has regulated itself remarkably well so that truth/content gets sufficient votes and falsehood/noise gets downvoted, and heavily so if needed.