sdfzug

you simply convert renewables to methane

cost of carbon which is there as much/little with renewables as it is with nuclear

now please translate it into non-marketing words, please.

He says Rust is on the top safe (vertical), but not at the bottom, because the bottom isn't fully proven.

He also says Zig is horizontally safe -> there is unsafe code on any layer, but also safe code. Also, it doesn't seem like there is something like "unsafe" for Zig. How can you say anything is safe then?

So Zig has one feature that makes it harder (impossible?) to write broken code than with Rust in UNSAFE code. How does this bring anything to the table besides eloquently dismiss Rusts safety guarantees? E.g. allowing to state libraries to only have safe code in them>

Afaik Rust let's you fully use the HW as well (and as much as possible within safe code).

last time I used it, it didn't play well with simultaneous editing

Define intelligence

> XMPP is designed to be grown, to have new capabilities added, to be experimented with.

so is Matrix.

your entire post is based on a wrong assumption...

Matrix has E2EE cloud chats

I must admit there is a use case for something like that, though I also must admit that I personally feel the same

afaik Wire works on MLS like many others do - but according to Wikipedia Wire uses the Signal Protocol. Your "source" does not back up your claim

Cheers for unregulated money

being far fetched seems like an understatement