Just because a new feature can't always easily be slipped into old codebases doesn't make it a bad feature.
6,309 karma · joined March 25, 2015
Just because a new feature can't always easily be slipped into old codebases doesn't make it a bad feature.
Comparing abortions to harvesting organs from cloned humans? I agree, definitely a weird strawman.
I don't think I've ever heard someone claim that Adderall isn't addictive.
> use of amphetamines and stimulants such as Adderall can result in tolerance and physiological dependence and can lead to the development of a substance use disorder. Misuse of prescription stimulants such as Adderall for any reason (e.g., to improve academic performance, reduce the effects of other drugs, etc.) is associated with both substance use disorders and use of other substances.
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/stimulants/amphetamine/...
The claim you're arguing against is that AI will replace software engineering as a discipline. Seems like you're instead saying that it will increase developer productivity, which no one disagrees with.
Didn't know Jordan Peterson was on HN.
It blows me away that there can be a consensus of hundreds/thousands of researchers on something, and one person (with a history of mis/disinformation) comes along with a counter narrative, and certain people will point at that one person as proof that everyone else is wrong or "on the take."
Not to mention rampant anti-intellectualism
That sort of show is still alive and well in the US, it's just moved from AM to podcasts.
God help us if companies start relying on LLMs for life-or-death stuff like insurance claim decisions.