> "Benevolent" is describing the context of the sexism, not judging that the sexism itself is morally good.
> The context of the term still heavily implies that "benevolent sexism" is a moral/social failure.
So...let's just call it sexism?
776 karma · joined April 8, 2018
> The context of the term still heavily implies that "benevolent sexism" is a moral/social failure.
So...let's just call it sexism?
No it does not, SpaceX results speak for themselves, they have no competition. Same with Tesla, just check their vehicles sold charts.
You'd have to be naive to expect that capitalism will not bring in innovation and improvement to Space exploration / solutions. I'm all for it.
When do drugs stop being experimental?
Got evidence for that? Because printing USDT after BTC went up is not a manipulation, but a liquidity boost.
Let's not forget that USDT isn't the only stablecoin in town, it's ratio is actually decreasing, all the way from 3k to 50k.
Did their bubbles also last 12 years, went through multiple bear/bull markets?
I keep seeing this metric everywhere, it's irrelevant, $GME became a meme stock, people are joining the sub to check out the fun, not to invest. Max 1% of them are really investing anything of value.
Kraken, Bitstamp, did so for 3 years+
Now try taking out 50 million or more, you'll face same difficulties.
This tether nonsense comes up every few months, still adamantly holding the 1:1.
Not mentioning that it's not the single dollar peg option in crypto space anymore, plenty of other options USDC, Dai.
• In the entire history of vaccines, only one has been recalled because the vaccine itself caused long term side effects (a rotavirus vaccine that had rare complications and no deaths for those under 1yr). If you can't find any papers about it, that's why. It's like finding a paper on death by lava lamp explosions. It's happened (https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-dec-01-na-brief....), but not enough to study it.
• Much of the speed was gained by relaxing enrollment rules, which are for study participant safety. The majority of normal study participants join in the last year or two anyways.
• These studies were larger than usual to make up for the decreased time. 30,000 people is a lot, and plenty to check for rare side effects.
• Then compare the odds that there's a common reaction that didn't show up in 30,000 participants against the ~5-10% chance of serious health complications from COVID. It's a no-brainer.
You can read the list of recalled vaccines and why they were recalled straight from the FDA (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history....).
You could easily localize COVID-19, just make a vaccination passport. No entry to a country if you're not vaccinated.
> How many locations globally have this level of refrigeration
Almost all developer countries, urban centres, where majority of people live anyway.
Huh? It's being improved constantly. Nothing like it in the car industry.