402 karma · joined March 28, 2008
And thanks for the design compliment! We did it all in-house, so we really appreciate the kind words.
We don't have export yet, but we've definitely wanted to share some of our entries with close friends and family too. We'll be brainstorming around this!
Regarding past history: For your first week, we just send you your entry from the previous day. After you've been using it for a week though, and some history has built up, we'll show you entries from a week ago (and then a month ago, etc.).
Thanks for checking it out - really appreciate it!
I'm happy to follow up more if you have any questions. Just shoot us an email at contact@meetingmix.com.
This is the same guy that put up this very job posting - he's just describing what the company does!
With social matters you usually need to be relentless and focus on other people's needs. The goal is to find out what's irking a friend or a customer and fix it to satisfy them.
I knew that the cutoff for an A was 90%, and I also knew that the grade would be calculated based on my projects and exams. I knew the exact weight of each project and exam too, all within the first few days of class.
I knew what was expected of me in this situation and didn't deliver, so it was my fault for not getting the A - not the grading system's fault. But my 89.4% was so close to an A that I somehow felt entitled to getting one, but as his quote points out, I didn't really deserve it.
I got an 89.4% in a CS class and asked the professor, whose office hours I frequented, if he could bump me up to an A since I was so close.
His response was: "If you truly understood the material and deserved an A, you would have earned an A by a large margin rather than missing it by a small one."
You're going to learn a lot while doing this - more than you would have at any corporate job - so regardless of what happens I wouldn't consider your experience a failure. The financial outcome isn't the only metric involved in success.
(referenced from Word of Mouth Marketing by Andy Sernovitz)
Yammer is Founders Fund backed. 3 of the 4 partners from the Founders Fund are PayPal cofounders (Peter Thiel is the big name, but there's also Ken Howery and Luke Nosek) - Yammer's CEO David Sacks was the COO at PayPal before its acquisition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect
"Across four studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd."
Your profile didn't have your email listed - if you could shoot me an email at gupta[at]ididwork.com I'd really appreciate it!
If performance reviews were that useful, why are they done only once a year? I feel like this should be a weekly conversation. Employee growth needs constant attention, but unfortunately it only happens for a handful of hours once a year.
My attitude is more pessimistic. I feel like these reviews are only useful for HR, so that they have a paper trail in place in the event that an employee needs to be terminated.
Edit: Just so my intentions are clear, I'm a cofounder of ididwork
"Working at Mahalo is sweet. We get Aeron chairs, 2 monitors, free food, free coffee, and free sodas."
It's still a sweet deal, but it just doesn't feel as nice when you learn that he was doing these things more for the bottom line.
That's not a good thing.
It's something we've been debating about, and it helps to know what a user would prefer. Right now you can star an entry, so the more important work gets prominence.