356 karma · joined February 28, 2014
[1] http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2005/09/2005-immigration-tr...
This is not at all about "where the data resides", as you claim, because the EU is not attacking the data where it resides -- it leaves that alone, on their original servers -- but instead where the data is indexed.
The circumstances by which they may be accessed include user agreement to "trust another computer", but may not be limited to that.
Because DROPOUTJEEP.
"The No Fly List, once distributed, clearly infringes upon a citizen's right to travel; and the Court cannot conclude based on the present record that there are no means less restrictive than an unqualified flight ban to adequately assure flight security, such as comprehensive preflight screening and searches. Second, the current record is inadequate to explain why judicial involvement before a person is placed on the No Fly List is either unnecessary or impractical, other than perhaps within the context of an emergency based on a specific, imminent threat that requires immediate action. Nor does the record conclusively establish that there cannot be any opportunity, either before or after an American citizen is placed on the No Fly List, to know of or challenge any of the information used to list him, even where such information could be summarized in a way that does not compromise sources or methods." [1]
(a) A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner's duly authorized agent.[1]
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON my_schema.* TO 'my_user'@'my_host' IDENTIFIED BY 'my_password';
The main issue with pointing to Wikimedia is that it seems to funnel people into Creative Commons licenses. Maybe that is not the intent, but that is what happens. I like the idea of a prominent place that encourages the Public Domain.
"It is clear from the record that Google was never named as a party to the suit, was never served with process, never waived or accepted process, and never made an appearance in the suit before the expunction order was entered. Nothing in the record establishes that Google stands in privity to the commission or to Jackson. Accordingly, we hold that Google was not a party to the suit and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter orders against Google." [1]
[1] https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140609/07402727525/texas...
New York City presentation suggests a driver with $90k revenue has $41k expenses. [1]
[1] http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/downloads/pdf/presentation.pdf
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/david-ignatius-a-demo...
See figure 6 here:
http://www.aei.org/files/2012/03/21/-fertility-decline-in-th...
https://www.freepress.net/sites/default/files/resources/Comc...
And you don't have to do it at all for payments tendered for merchandise, or almost any payment to corporations.
Why isn't "Fundraising Platform" in the left column clickable? That should lead to expository text, but it isn't even a link.