shotnothing

its unobvious on purpose, they dont want people to a/b test their jailbreaks

whats shallow about the research? it all seems to check out?

> Similarly, it seems like languages with de Bruijn indices are immune to LLMs

i think large chain of thought LLMs (e.g. o3) might be able to manage

so does steve jobs, seems to have worked out for him

much more relative to the average worker in many other industries

> I definitely don’t learn math by means of gradient descents.

https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP282747

i think there have been many observations and studies reporting emergent intelligence

sounds like they should have added a warning

> if the sites tracking these sort of things can be believed

I really don't think they can

As you have said, neither you nor the other guy is qualified to make a technical assesment on this and we just have to wait for yhe investigations to play out.

However, what we can assess is the ex-employee's actions and multitude of claims, which while in isolation seems benign, together makes her look more like a vengeful ex-employee than a credible victim

but it's a strong indictor

just two? given how massive the US and its industrial capacity is, I'd expect it to be way more

> They rather famously switched to an Xbox controller for their rolling drones, and for their submarine controls, because they just work better.

Like oceangate?

I think software and ecosystem is a big part of it, much more than just hardware

The thing is, the death penalties in Singapore are in the single digits per year (out of a population of 6 million, effectively higher as this excludes non-citizens). People are not killed without thought, there is careful and lengthy investigations in each and every case.

The deterrence does work and saves countless lives that would have been taken from ODs and cartel-ish activities

how?

oftentimes, the metric of a journalist's success is not how accurate or well researched an article is

it is how accessible is, even at the cost of nuance, which leads to more clicks

journalists are knowledgeable -> average person says yes

ordinary people are knowledgeable -> average person says not necessarily

> for example, only people with gmail accounts that are over 5 years old and who use them at least 3 times per week to eliminate fakers—-but keep this a secret

tbh this is just a bandage, its just going to get botted once people discover the pattern (a lot of premium bot farms do offer mature or hacked gmail accounts anyway) and its going to be worse for legitimate discovery

after work as an embedded systems engineer, I play a game where I am an embedded systems engineer

10/10 asm is life

but the ability to get horses to pull carts is not tied to expert knowledge of hand-pushing plows, neither is machinery to horse-pulling. This is not really the case for AI

ad revenue

Touchscreen is great, touchscreen first UIs are not. I use a touchscreen laptop and the number of times I subconsciously try and tap/scroll/pinch the screen when I use macbooks is frustrating. It is such an improvement over trackpad and a nice compliment to keyboard+mouse

is it actually?

but the article shows top of the line androids being dominated by even old iphones

> Having to be completely obedient to the state wears on the soul

I think this is very overstated, people break laws and talk shit all the time. Just don't do drugs and be an asshole and you should be fine, many laws are not enforced

the forming of those relationships, vision to form a tax haven and ability to stay in power by managing relationships between foreign powers to not experience a 'coup' is precisely leadership

but there was heavy foreign influence and support on the left-wingers and pro-worker representation, from the communist bloc

it has double the VRAM on a single card, thats significant

i think you made a point for why being opinionated is good, which is not really the debate here