sillywabbit

I'm happy for you. Enjoy your spaghetti.

Googling is a skill. AI is a slot machine.

The banks wouldn't write those loans for something they expect to go down in value.

I suppose you could always buy a mobile home.

Sorry, I don't understand. Can you explain again please?

ChatGPT suggests the land might have appreciated, the neighborhood may be more desirable, inflation, or development potential. We don't need programmers anymore because LLMs can do it. It must be an expert on home values too.

Your analogy might be applicable to the sale of an RV.

> Why are you then owed money? Why is that a fair expectation?

Because getting the mortgage to buy the house involves parting with a large sum of money, after which some part of the mortgage payment goes towards something called principal. If it just goes towards interest, it may as well be rent.

Not to mention that when you try to sell the thing, there's some expectation by one or more third parties of some percentage of it.

I misjudged the tone of your comment at the time I wrote that. My bad.

Personally, I'm still dealing with fallout from temporary cannabis-induced psychosis.

Keep the downvotes coming. Points matter.

Thank you for your contribution to the ongoing stigma surrounding mental illness. Never forget, you are the hero of this story.

Some of us find it very hard to know what you want to do for the rest of your life at twice that age. There are a lot of trains.

The antique illustrations on this are fantastic.

Anesthesia is a rather different state than sleep.

What comes after that?

Maximizing shareholder value seems like a weird thing to hold as a moral imperative.

> AI doesn't exist to make extroverts feel better about themselves

Then why are the extroverts trying to replace engineers with AI?

Internet Doomsday Evangelist seems to be a role with infinite chairs.

You can store Perl in any file format.

I don't think you've seen many biology field data sets.

It's not even standard in academia.

What? Eddie and Alexei were the heroes of that story, and they got screwed.

Assuming that everyone you meet is conspiring against you seems to be a pre-requisite to these. The feasibility of that is questionable.

Back in the day, being a teenager and hanging out on freelancing forums was enough.

I've also heard good things about Celeste and Silksong.

Using the word priors in the way you (and others) do.

Could you point me to your research?

Meth causes brain damage. Dex doesn't.

I used to value this sort of communication. Sometimes I still do. Some feedback I got once that seems relevant to anyone who prefers this style:

----

Key takeways:

1. People are more important than code.

2. People have a right to work in an environment free of perceived hostility.

3. There is a legitimate reason for the perception and hard work may be necessary to understand why this is.

Ask yourself these questions periodically during a conversation:

1. Am I listening to the other person?

2. Is there an equal amount of give and take or is my primary objective to make someone understand my point of view?

3. Does the person want to understand what I am saying?

Like the other poster said, the rabbit hole continues with suffix arrays (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_array#Space_efficiency), then compressed suffix arrays (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_suffix_array).

Also explained by the creator of this: https://www.abahgat.com/project/suffix-tree/

> the human genome can be encoded as a 3GB string constructed out of an alphabet of four characters

> As of 2019, a suffix tree indexing the human genome using state of the art algorithms can easily occupy tens of gigabytes.

In the event someone is encountering suffix trees for the first time and thinking of using one: the amount of RAM required for suffix trees is obscene.

Rushing prematurely into precipitate does sound pretty dangerous.