Most of my devices hover around 90% for months, then drop to 60% and die within a day. I've stopped bothering with preemptive maintenance, and just replace batteries when devices drop offline.
956 karma · joined January 6, 2010
Most of my devices hover around 90% for months, then drop to 60% and die within a day. I've stopped bothering with preemptive maintenance, and just replace batteries when devices drop offline.
devices:
- /dev/ttyUSB0:/dev/ttyUSB0What's more, you'll need an AC to play pc games. My home office room is ~6m2, and even the current 500w machine I have there can noticeably bump the temperatures under load.
And same for Thailand / Siam, same in both entries.
The Samsung replacement apps is down to personal preference, I find them easier to use than Google "originals".
Having casually interacted with phones from other brands, I consider Samsung among the best Android options as far as software and UX goes.
I don't get spam mailing lists or robocalls. I can safely sign up to services knowing I will be able to unsubscribe easily. I can buy things online knowing they can be easily returned.
Yes, some of my clients lament the inability to use those patterns. I politely smile and nod.
If doing things exactly the way you envision involves building the world from scratch, it's often better business to go with a "less elegant" solution that can be rapidly pieced together from mainly ready-made components.
I've often earned long-lasting trust and cooperation of clients by asking whether they would like to adjust (or forego entirely) that one feature, if the project ended up being 20 or more % cheaper/faster to deliver. And given that choice, it's surprising how flexible businesses can be.
For me, the bank website is where I pay the bills, review my cash flow, and manage investments / savings. Even if others could be replaced, I can't imagine going to a physical branch just to pay for my internet connection.
I update only when there is some feature I absolutely need to have. And even when there is a new feature, give it a month or two to mature before using. I run a specific docker tag with auto-updates disabled. The instance is not internet accessible, so less care needed for security patches. When there is an exciting new feature, I apply that excitement to the busywork necessary for HA updates, and power through.
Furthermore, I use the built-in UI only for administration purposes. Run a custom react app that talks to HA via websocket/rest APIs. Those are pretty stable in my experience. Same with YAML configured automations.
Sounds like a lot of work, but I feel that it's offset by someone else writing the integrations with 3rd party services. When I want to control my new robot vacuum cleaner from my custom dashboard, all I have to provide is the UI. Someone else has figured out how to talk with the vac APIs, how to authenticate requests, and what to do to avoid getting rate-limited by the 3rd party service. I have to deal with only the HA quirks, not every 3rd party service quirk.
It might be sovietophobic in the sense we would rather not have it repeat, to put mildly. But for the occupied regions, it was far from fiction.
I learned most of the topics in those videos well enough to pass highschool/university exams, but very often the real "aha!" moment came after seeing lines transform from one into another, planes deforming, or boxes being subdivided in 3blue1brown video.
Now that I've recently become a parent, it's... it's shocking. The idea of handing someone that young and helpless off to strangers raises a strong "NO!" reaction, right from the gut instead of the brain.
In my neck of the woods we get 1.5 years maternity leave, and experiencing it myself I'm honestly not sure even that is enough.
Sure, if you make seconds-long animations on every interaction, or implement this for blog posts, it's going to be unusable.
But for web apps, short animations in UI transformation make it feel more... held together I guess. Consistent. I like it.
Web apps, not as much.
It does not maximize its chances of survival. It does not maximize the count of its offspring. Just the correctness score.
We have taught these systems that "human-like" responses are correct. That's why you feel like talking to an intelligent being, the models are good at maximizing the "human-likeness" of their responses.
But under the hood it's a markov chain. A very sophisticated markov chain, with lots of bling. Sure, when talking to investors, it's the second coming of sliced bread. But come on.