1,662 karma · joined March 8, 2021
I guess there’ll be some guy at google going through every blog and saying whether it’s reliable or not?
I only knew that because i saw the movie, but it’s a clear sign that the internet is going to shit for quality information
LLMs are very good at this clearly
Software is in such a state now, Gmail is full of bugs around sharing attachments to the position that I have to tell my dad to turn his phone off and on again in order to attach a document
Seen in foreign workers remote driving ai cars, foreign workers training ai robots, etc etc
His eyes glaze over and he just reads that instead in his corner vision instead of listening to you, and you get snubbed forever more
But there’s so many combinations available but only like 5 pictures? You should be able to see every combination example easily in order to make a decision
Also, you say it's an egregious privacy violation, but every other modern president released their tax returns willingly. Trump is bucking tradition here. As per usual.
What about 2200? Humanity at 2300? It's the same planet with the same feedback loops after all.
There is clearly a temperature at which this planet will not support human life, and we could definitely get the planet to that temperature if we don't change course and reach net zero.
Saying its not an existential threat is just wild to me.
All of us are slightly wrong about things, but not all of us are treated as oracles of correct information like Opus, ChatGPT, etc are
I got confused because a journal referenced them > The experiment’s reach has now spread into the published medical literature. The bixonimania research has been cited by a handful of researchers, including a study that appeared in Cureus, a journal published by Springer Nature, the publisher of Nature, by researchers at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in Mullana, India (S. Banchhor et al. Cureus 16, e74625 (2024); retraction 18, r223 (2026)). (Nature’s news team is editorially independent of its publisher.)
The AI told the government what it wanted to hear contrary to its entire security apparatus, and then they went to war assuming they could win
If the person put their product as th definitive cure for the made up disease, the LLM probably would have mentioned that too.
> merely assumed the disease was true when the preprint was pointed at it.
What do you mean by preprint pointed at it? It being the disease?
Most doctors would not believe that, and would also consider any new eye disease they’d never see in real life with scepticism
It’s gunna be even wilder when people realise they have an incentive to seed fake information on the internet to game AI product recommendations
I’ve already bought stuff based off of an AI suggestion, I didn’t even consider it would be so easy to influence the suggestion. Just two research papers? Mad.