I played that game!! Although I was 10 years old and barely knew any English. After some playing, I always got a "go home" note on my windshield, I never found out why.
9 karma · joined March 30, 2026
Are there really two principal components or is that primarily your choice of visualization?
To extract properties to verify... you call Claude??
My use case is ssh. I would like to stick my private key into a local Docker container, have a ssh-identical cli that reverse proxies into the container, and have some rules about what ssh commands the container may proxy or not.
Does anyone know of something like this?
It seems to me that this is more or less the same thing, but Monte Carlo. Like MCMC vs symbolic Bayesian inference.
Definitely the right call on Windows, though. Even my parents (in their mid-seventies) moved to Linux this year.
After the first run, you have a script and an API: the agent discovery mechanism is a detail. If the script is small enough, and the task custom enough, you could simply add the script to the context and say "use this, adapt if needed".
Or am I misunderstanding you?
I am a scientific research engineer (bioinformatics), and here no one cares much about covering all the possible code paths.
What we care about is if the code computes "the correct thing", i.e. that it represents the underlying science.
No such guarantee with LLMs. But no such guarantee without LLMs, either (the "code growing above our heads" has happened already, a long time ago). Still, I would say that LLMs are a big net positive for us: they are better at checking such things than we are.
What about adding a Make rule to auto-generate the one-liner install from the binary?
(Not sure if it would be Sumerian, Esperanto or something more artificial. As long as it is esoteric enough for one company to hoard all the expertise in it.)
That being said: I feel that there must be some kind of benchmark for this. If no such benchmark exists, use your framework, pair up with a couple of pharmacists, and create one.
The First Age / Second Age boundary is not unlike the K/T boundary...
Compared to that, Second Age / Third Age isn't that different (places like Dunland and Tharbad were forested, according to Treebeard). So if you wish to make the map a bit more ageless, you could just add a few alternate names. - Dol Guldur was Amon Lanc in the Second Age - Lothlorien was Laurelindorenan in the Second Age - Mirkwood, Minas Tirith and Minas Morgul are late-Third-Age-isms too.