1,397 karma · joined March 15, 2015
My posts and comments do not reflect the views of my employer.
Blue Apron’s high churn rate was probably tied to their offering of free deliveries. That’s how I found out about it and received my first delivery. I did not continue as a subscriber after that, though.
If you get to be that large of a company (100 workers => 4% of staff => ~2500 employees) and you are not making a profit, there is something wrong. Bringing all of those people onboard seems like a waste of investor money.
That said, I am a fan of Blue Apron and I do hope that their figure out a way to operate in a profitable manner soon.
Edit: as replies point out, profitability isn’t a great indicator for the success of a company. While it is fair game to ask, there are other better indicators (churn and burn, existing customer base, etc) that give a better picture. My point was that I think a company at this size should be profitable or working aggressively to make that possible. I think Blue Apron is laying these people off to accomplish that.
Enjoy your time off!
In case you haven’t heard it enough though: go vote tomorrow. :)
That said, like many similar interview/hiring stories shared here, it reeks of single-sidedness. Specifically, there is not enough detail regarding your interactions with the interviewers to warrant calling this a horror story. The only points of interest in this piece, in my opinion, were that the interviewers were late and there was a clear communication issue (particularly when it came to scheduling the interviews).
Other than that, all we know is that you tripped up during some of your interviews. In those situations, based on your post, it was never really your fault, which is not the best attitude to have.
Finally, them saying that your engineering skills needed more work shouldn’t be insulting. Amazon hires tons of engineers and they are generally very technically competent. However good you think you are, there are millions who are just as good, and there are thousands who are better. Amazon can only hire so many people and this was likely their way of saying they simply had more candidates with more experience.
I know it is frustrating. I can say this because I have absolutely been in your shoes. (Dream job, all the way to the last stage, then no offer.) At the end of the day, we have to acknowledge the competitiveness of our field and use that to drive us to become better.
The idea is to cast a large net so that maybe, just maybe, a small number of Democratic males would abstain. Especially in swing states, every single vote is extremely valuable to both parties.
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Looking for opportunities in NYC or Boston.
Technologies: JavaScript, Python, Rust, C++, Vue, React, React Native, Electron, NodeJS, Swift/iOS, Java/Android, Google Cloud Platform, AWS, Jupyter Notebooks
Resume: https://roth.fyi/october.2018.pdf
Email: sam+hn@roth.fyi
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
If you are going to take a few minutes and write about a launch or release like this, please take the extra few seconds to include a link for your readers. Make your content useful.
Relevant: https://privacy.apple.com/
I suppose business dealings between the university and contractors is public to some extent, but it seems plausible that this attack came from within the university or the contractor.
This regulation is clearly made by people who don't understand the technology and capabilities of these devices. A waste of time and money; who is going to train customs officials to search through phones?
Hopefully time saved results in more bugs found :)
As I’m guessing was intended, this problem is particularly well-suited for engineering interviews because you can start with an easy example (the DAG one could derive in this specific interview) then ask the applicant how the solution would change given the additional constraints you’ve described.
Had to Google what a Hamiltonian graph was though. I’ve been listening to the musical too much.