1,448 karma · joined September 20, 2011
How is this different than when Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Oracle, HP and Google "hide" their money offshore in places like Ireland and the Cayman Islands, which helps them avoid repatriating their profits overseas and paying taxes on them?
It isn't. The point of this is that Putin is doing it.
Look at "Who supports our work"
It has Soros' fingerprints all over it. He's at it again: attacking nationalism (Russia, far-right parties) and promoting globalism.
The whole operation isn't exposing anything we don't know: rich people are rich and use whatever means at their disposal to keep rich. In fact, this is a media operation more than anything to villainize Putin and anyone associated with him. The truth is, pretty much every nation and its leaders are guilty of this.
Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov says that some mass media are preparing an outspoken pre-planned media attack against Putin and his entourage, according to Russian news agency TASS. http://www.unian.info/world/1302754-kremlin-some-mass-media-...
Why would the anti-russia media focus on one powerful rich person as being bad?
Gee, I wonder...
You value the apple more then getting 1.5 apples later I value getting 1.5 apples later more than I value getting the apple now
You got something, I'll get something.
You must be new to the geekosphere, so let me answer that for you: People like to white knight visible minorities and women while also pretending that everyone can do what they like for a living and that the rich should foot the bill for it.
To say it's just a story about her experience is subversive, to say the least.
What I gathered from this is that the author is making bad career choices and people in her family are prone to making bad choices.
She can't handle a woman laughing at her, so she decides to be a writer like her father. Seems like not growing up and having poor decision-making skills is what's stopping her upward mobility.
Buzzfeed is full of examples of this idea: I should be able to do what I want for a living because I want to do it, and it should make me upwardly mobile.
That doesn't follow at all. Just because people do chores it doesn't mean they aren't able to live or that they are less than human.
The message is "tax the rich".
Ladies and gentlemen, just remember that economic bubbles aren't only bubbles in assets, finance, and the structure of the economy, but also the psychology of the people.
The number is actually closer to 1-2%.
Cantillon effects: In Essai, Cantillon provided an advanced version of John Locke's quantity theory of money, focusing on relative inflation and the velocity of money.[61] Cantillon suggested that inflation occurs gradually and that the new supply of money has a localised effect on inflation, effectively originating the concept of non-neutral money.[62] Furthermore, he posited that the original recipients of new money enjoy higher standards of living at the expense of later recipients.[63] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cantillon#Monetary_the...
Right now, banks and then gov't are the first recipients of new money being injected into the system a la central banking.
Wealth distribution schemes implemented through fiscal policy (taxes and tax credits/grants/UBI) can be undermined through monetary policy this way.
Yes... they somehow impose carbon taxes, go to climate summits and make up protocols to agree to but none of them believe in climate change.
It shouldn't. The climate has always been changing. Do that thing that humans do: be adaptable.
Oh wait, that's already happening and it's got a court ruling backing it: http://www.wsj.com/articles/court-rules-baker-cant-refuse-to...